Some people believe that social media sites, such as Facebook or Twitter, have a negative impact on young people and their ability to form personal relationships. Others believe that these sites bring people together in a beneficial way.
With the advancement of technology, not only has older people started spending significant amount of time socializing on their phone, but it has also affected younger generation. The given topic asserts that social media applications have negatively affected the ability of socialization of young people. Through this essay I will examine the dimensions of this topic through examples and assertions and shape up my opinion by the end.
On one hand, people believe that social media helps people connect with each other, as it allows communication with people from around the world through chatting and video calling. In addition, it also helps people to communicate by sharing thoughts and pictures with each other. For example, these applications also provide the opportunity to learn about different cultures and heritage of different people.
On the contrary, there are people who believe that it has negative effects on the social ability of youngsters. One of the main reason is that they spend more time on their phones rather than socializing with people around them. Moreover, they disconnect from the real world, and falls into the trap of fake emotions of social media. For instance, a recent study conducted by “ The Tribune” states that 86% of the lifestyle shown on social media is fake and 65% of the online friends are scammers looking for their prey.
Nevertheless, weighing both the sides of the opinions, I take the ground that, although social media applications have made it easier for people to communicate and make friends but the negative consequences of social media outweighs the advantages. Therefore, government should take stringent action to promote socialism, in order to make sure that young people spend significant amount of time socializing in person rather than online.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-09 | Anmol Bal | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-01 | kinnarimehta85 | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-01 | kinnarimehta85 | 61 | view |
- The graph below shows the acid level in mouth from consumption of sugar and honey Eating sweet foods produces acid in the mouth which can cause tooth decay High acid levels are measured by low pH values 39
- Many countries are experiencing serious problems with their environment with pollution of their land water and air What are these problems and how might they be reduced 78
- Some companies have uniforms for their staff which must be worn at all times. What are advantages for a company of having a uniform? Are there any benefits of having a uniform for the staff? 56
- Homelessness is increasing in many major cities around the world What do you think are the main causes of this problem and what measures could be taken to solve it Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or e 67
- Polygamy has lead to massive divorce rate around the globe. Give possible solution and discuss the reasons behind the issue? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 325, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...ion of young people. Through this essay I will examine the dimensions of this top...
^
Line 7, column 56, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...eighing both the sides of the opinions, I take the ground that, although social m...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30795847751 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7291585542 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546712802768 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0273746915 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.833333333 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.58333333333 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309714830063 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123091966245 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0856850118099 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190712848581 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0257255328224 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.