The line graph shows the percentage of people living below poverty line (According to world standards) in developing countries for the year 1900 to 2050.
The provided line graph illustrates the pecentage of population under poverty line which is conducted by world standards in developing nations from 1900 to 2050. The data is calibrated in per centum. It is clear and coherent representation.
Overall, it is evident from given layout, Maxico and Brazil will have same and maximum percentage of population below poverty line whereas only upto 35 and 15 percent of population will be below poverty line of India and China respectively in 2050.
It can be seen that in 1900 there was nearly about 15 percent of people of China below poverty line, which raised upto 60 percent in 2000, and will decline to initial level again in 2050. In addition to this, upto 10 percent of Indian population was below poverty line in 1900 which increased gradually above 60 percent in 2000 and will finally lower to almost 35 percent in 2050.
As far as the trend is concerned 30 percent residents of Brazil remained below poverty line till 1950, increased upto 95 percent in 2000 and will remain same till 2050. Moreover, in Mexico people below poverty line increased steadily from 1900 to 2000 and will become same as that of Brazil by 2050.
- In many countries the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Some think this is good while others believe this is a problem for a country. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
- Some people think it is good thing for senior management positions to have very high salaries compared to other workers of the same company or organisation. To what extent you agree? 84
- In many countries women no longer feel the need to get married. Some peoplethat this is because women are able to earn their own income and therefore do not require security a man can bring. To what extent you agree or disagree? 61
- Some people think that children should learn how to compete, but others think that children should be taught to cooperate to become more useful adults. Express some reasons for both views and give your own opinion. 56
- Describe the table and pie chart below which shows the spending habits of teenagers in Australia. The table shows the amount of dolllars spent on various activities per week while the pie chart shows amount spent on education. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, moreover, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1024.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85308056872 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45744537222 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.469194312796 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.7621811974 43.030603864 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.375 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366530240532 0.215688989381 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178067395432 0.103423049105 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122489948962 0.0843802449381 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253244005879 0.15604864568 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565801471535 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.