Some people believe that students should be taught international news as a subject at school. Others feel that this would be a waste of valuable school time. Discuss both views and give your opinion
There is currently a contentious argument over international news being taught as a separate subject in schools. While some people believe that the knowledge of events occurring globally is essential for broadening the perspective of kids, however; others believe that it is simply a waste of time and deflects the attention of the children from important issues that needs to be focused in their own country or state. In this essay I will discuss both the views and then conclude my opinion.
Beyond any qualms there are myriads of rationale reasons favoring the necessity of international news to be taught as a separate subject in educational institutions. Firstly, kids gain a broad perspective about the events and issues that are occurring globally. For example, global issues such as climate changes due to global warming or spread of pandemic such as COVID-19 that can affect them personally in near future. Moreover, by participating in worldwide media studies they also gain a clear perspective about the latest inventions, new gadgets in market and recent discoveries. For example, artificial intelligence powered robots and discoveries related to new vaccines. Therefore, it is important for kids to have a separate subject for international news in the schools.
On the contrary, others believe that making such a subject compulsory in schools would deflect the interest of kids from the actual issues that are being faced by the people in their own country or state. Furthermore, the social media does not always give the actual picture about the political events occurring in another country and they might start believing in a lie. For example, incidents of mob lynching by spreading fake news on social media platforms have caused much death in India. Therefore, others believe that international news should not be taught as a subject in schools as it might give rise to hatred and controversies among children as they are more vulnerable to believe in fake news and act without thinking a second thought.
In conclusion, I believe that teaching international news has certain benefits such as giving a worldwide perspective, however; it should not be an additional subject in schools. Children are too vulnerable as they might end up believing some fake news and form permanent beliefs and hatred towards a particular religion or political group throughout for life.
- University education should be free to everyone regardless of income To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge Write at least 250 words 73
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write about the following topic University education should be free to everyone regardless of income To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from 78
- Some believe that charitable organizations should help people no matter where they live Others argue that charities should only help those living in the country where the charity is based Discuss both views and give your opinion 87
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write about the following topic In some countries it is now illegal to reject someone applying for a job because of his or her age Do you think this is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your 56
- Some people believe that job provides both income and a social life while others think that friends should be made outside of work Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 361, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or political group throughout for life.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2007.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2265625 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8924954065 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.4921875 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 622.8 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.3012959805 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.8 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.73333333333 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335915365048 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108546415138 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0957680866639 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214180425893 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0925471595614 0.056905535591 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.