SOME PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT TAXING COMPANIES, WHICH CAUSE IT, IS THE BEST WAY TO REDUCE INDUSTRIAL POLLUTION WHILE SOME SUGGEST THAT THERE ARE SEVERAL OTHER WAYS TO SOLVE THIS TROUBLE. DISCUSS BOTH VIEWS AND GIVE OPINION.
It is considered by one part of the society that imposing massive tax on the corporations is the finest means to restrain the pollution generated by them, whereas other says that there are many different ways to tackle this problem. In my opinion, although taxing is good to control pollution, other ways are helping to halt the pollution trouble by not putting burden on local people.
Taxes, nowadays, are imposed on the numerous companies and entrepreneurs by the incumbent government to curb down the industrial pollution. Industries will use special procedures and technical machinery as it will certainly help to reduce the toxic emissions, which will, undoubtedly, save them to secure themselves from the gigantic taxes. Harmful waste, resultantly,coming from the production lines, which are using updated machines, will decline enormously, which further causes less pollution in the surroundings. To exemplify, in Ludhiana, one of the districts of Punjab, a plethora of factories uses special techniques which lead to exhaustion of produce white smoke instead of the black smoke, which contains noxious gases, to save themselves from the huge taxes.
Nevertheless, there are various methods that can be opted by the industries to cut down the environmental contamination. Firstly, government can provide the special areas having trees and plants for settling up these industries such as outskirts of city. By doing this, air pollution can be controlled to a great extent as trees helps in absorbing harmful gases like carbon dioxide, and providing oxygen in return to the workers. Global warming, consequently, dwindle its effect on the earth. Secondly, entrepreneurs can use biodegradable and renewable resources for production in their manufacturing sectors. Therefore, they will safeguard the atmosphere from the effluents causing pollution.
In my opinion, taxing is a good way to control pollution; however, variety of measures can help more to control the industrial pollution by not putting burden on local masses as levying more tax on the industries will not only increase the prices of products, but this will also risen up the inflation in the economy.
In conclusion, using biodegradable products and setting up the industrial units in particular areas produces less pollution instead of stringent tax policies of the government authorities on companies causing pollution.
- TOO MANY OLD HISTORIC BUILDINGS ARE IN DANGER AND DESTROYED IN MANY COUNTRIES WHAT ARE THE MAIN REASON HOW TO PROTECT THEM 52
- THERE SEEMS TO BE AN INCREASING NUMBER OF SERIOUS CRIMES COMMITTED EACH YEAR. WHILE SOME THINK THE BEST WAY IS TO USE THE DEATH PENALTY AS A DETERRENT, MANY PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT OTHER MEASURES WILL BE NEEDED.DISCUSS BOTH SIDES. 67
- IN GENERAL PEOPLE DO NOT HAVE SUCH A CLOSE RELATIONSHIP WITH THEIR NEIGHBORS AS COMPARED TO THE PAST? WHY THIS IS SO? AND WHAT CAN BE DONE TO IMPROVE THE CONTACT BETWEEN THE NEIGHBORS? 84
- PLANTING TREE IS VERY IMPORTANT FOR THE ENVIRONMENT. SOME PEOPLE SAY TREES SHOULD BE PLANTED IN THE VACANT AREA OF CITIES AND TOWNS, WHILE OTHERS SAYS HOUSING FACILITIES SHOULD BE BUILD INSTEAD.DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE? 67
- Nowadays a lot of people are able to do their work from home Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this development 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...them, whereas other says that there are many different ways to tackle this problem. In my opin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 372, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...llution trouble by not putting burden on local people. Taxes, nowadays, are i...
^^
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , coming
...gantic taxes. Harmful waste, resultantly,coming from the production lines, which are us...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, in conclusion, in particular, such as, in my opinion, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2038.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52303523035 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06479503687 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552845528455 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.9737993242 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.571428571 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3571428571 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.9285714286 7.06120827912 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184560337476 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617463154427 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467127279151 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110902995942 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047027549196 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.28 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.