Nowadays, there is an obvious phenomenon that family members become much farther than before. While there are several reasons contributing this result, we still have plenty of feasible measures to alleviate this problem.
Many factors of society and individuals changed the distance of family members. Firstly, the development of society have an influences on every aspects of out contemporary lives, especially the high mobility. Twenty years ago, most of children lived in the same city even the same neighborhood as their parents, while most of young people move to metropolitan to chase for their dreams. As a result, the physical distances effects the psychological distances of family member. What’s More, modern life have a high speed and people are always busy working and having fun. More and more parents don’t have time to pick up children after school and the only thing they can do is spending money to let other people look after their kids. Last but not the least, the friend circle of modern residents expands significantly comparison to people decades ago. We can communicate and build relationship not only with our relatives but also with our colleagues or someone met online.
Luckily, both governments and individuals own lots of solutions to cope with it. First of all, the government could increase the holiday days, when citizens are able to go back to their hometown or parents’ home. On the side of individuals, we need to enhance the awareness of family. With the technology of information such as Wechat and Facetime, we could chat with people thousands kilometers away without difficulties. In my family, we always share wonderful moments in our life on Wechat Groupchat.
After having discussed the most pertinent points of this issue, I’m convinced that we could apply many methods to get touch with our loved people, although the process of urbanization and migration will make us part with our family.
- Studies suggest that children spend more time watching TV than they did in the past and they spend less time in doing active or creative things What are the causes and what methods can be used to solve the problem 95
- More and more people work from home and study from home with the development of computer technology. DO you think it is positive or negative development? 56
- UK telephone calls, by category, 1995-2002. 78
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective? 89
- Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the society in which they are sold.To what extent do you agree or disagree. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an influence' or simply 'influences'?
Suggestion: an influence; influences
...irstly, the development of society have an influences on every aspects of out contemporary li...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 228, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the children') or simply say ''most children''.
Suggestion: most of the children; most children
...ly the high mobility. Twenty years ago, most of children lived in the same city even the same ne...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, so, still, while, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1650.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22151898734 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76281590746 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626582278481 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7507309879 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.125 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5625 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0748722037566 0.244688304435 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0268695803032 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0353696401019 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0520775009996 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318931641226 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.