There are predominantly two contrasting views where a section of society believes that freelancer photographer should not pursue taking photos of celebrities personal and private life which inclines their career while others emphasize that it is a publicity stunt for becoming popular among the general public. In this essay, I will discuss both contrasting views in detail, and conclude my view.
On the one side, evidently, everyone has a personal and professional life. Thus, a celeb has also a private life which has every right to keep personal life from his or her social surroundings. Because showing personal life on media channels by journalists can affect their social relationships and social life. Moreover, a celebrity could develop a phobia about being advertised in every situation, and are deprived of entitled social and personal contentment. Although it may be a fun of entertainment for the audiences like viewers and readers about reading personal life articles of famous persons, it has detrimental effects on celebrities life. Thus, it is essential for paparazzi to stay in limitations and ask permission from famous persons while taking their pictures.
On the flip side, some individuals think that the paparazzi is the significant and fundamental methodology to intensify the stardom of stars by publicizing the personality and behavior of celebs among commoners. Interestingly, the freelancer photographers document the life of personalities and entrepreneurs through photos and exhibit the telecast reports about their philanthropic deeds. To illustrate, BBC reported that journalists who are publishing reports of famous personalities have a direct nexus with the escalation of TRP of famous celebs across the globe.
To conclude, in my opinion, although telecast and posting images on media channels about famous persons can be a positive effect, paparazzi should ask permission from celebs before posting about their personal lives because it could affect social relationships in their lives.
- The first man to walk on the moon claimed it was a step forward for mankind However it has made little difference in most people s lives 87
- You are planning a short visit to a city where one of your relatives lives Write a letter to your relative In your letter Explain when and how long you will be in town Ask whether you can stay at their home Offer to pay for yourself 67
- Every year several languages die out Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer language in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- Many people continue to use cars and motorcycles even though they know that they are bad for the environment Why this What can be done to reduce the use of these vehicles 67
- The first man to walk on the moon claimed it was a step forward for mankind However it has made little difference in most people s lives 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 248, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reer while others emphasize that it is a publicity stunt for becoming popular amo...
^^
Line 1, column 297, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ty stunt for becoming popular among the general public. In this essay, I will discuss both con...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 634, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'celebrities'' or 'celebrity's'?
Suggestion: celebrities'; celebrity's
... persons, it has detrimental effects on celebrities life. Thus, it is essential for papara...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, moreover, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1724.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5974025974 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07690815674 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542207792208 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.2043572007 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.666666667 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.58333333333 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115176579708 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488347308471 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409030555935 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.079199385943 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377603193472 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.