People have differing views with regard to the question of how to affect our future on good way. While in some ways it may seem harmful to our society, I personally believe that robots ought to be exploited more and more now.
There are various reasons why it might be considered to develop robots affect our life negatively. Firstly, It is affiliated with job markets in every category of business. More and more workers are seeing their full-time and part-time jobs replaced by robots. Because businesses can reduce cost price therethrough, they can earn more profit from that. Secondly, Robots could make emotionless atmosphere in our particular society cause they don’t feel emotion as like human. It is important thing to live in the world that being human and feel the emotions. For instance, most of government decided that replaced public service to machinery for citizens, it’s anticipating less much of communication.
However, I would agree with this who believe that robot’s development will bring us huge impacts in the future. For instance, if robots would release for helping disable people in society, then robots work for some of them and improve their daily life. That is always needed service for them and their family. Another good example could be that there is less chance to occur any accidents. To use a factory for an example, the machines can work instead of human while high risk processing. As result, it would avoid an accident also, errors will be decreased.
In conclusion, while robots can occur to negative effects, I believe that robot science keep developed for our convince and better life. Also, people who developing robot science ought to lead right way.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, while, for instance, in conclusion, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09219858156 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57463415052 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606382978723 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.2589783945 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.4705882353 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5882352941 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181946142188 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.05545241207 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486382911848 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116475897882 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0225331506828 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.