Some people prefer to spend time with one or two close friends. Others choose to spend time with a large number of friends. Comparethe advantages of each choice. Which of these two ways of spending time do you prefer? Use specific reasons to support your

Essay topics:

Some people prefer to spend time with one or two close friends. Others choose to spend time with a large number of friends. Compare
the advantages of each choice. Which of these two ways of spending time do you prefer? Use specific reasons to support your answer.

Friends are people who support us through our lives. Some people prefer to have one or two close friends. However, others prefer to spent their time with many friends. I think that the number of friends depends on one's personality. Personally, I prefer to have a couple of close friends. In this essay I will analyze both cases and present my view in favor of having a few close friends.

First of all, a person can establish closer relationships with a few friends. They can spend their time together, relax, watch a movie in a silence that does not feel awkward. Second of all, close friends have more familiar atmosphere. They can share many beautiful moments and thoughts. For example, I have only two close friends - my husband and my class-mate. I can share my worries and great news and can tell everything to them.

From the other side, having many friends can be hard and stressful. One has to spend his or her time with each of them. I think it is not healthy because a person does not have time to relax and contemplate about his/her own life. I know this type of people. They like to be in the center of everyone's attention. They talk a lot, make jokes, tell stories and rumors. Unfortunately, they basically do not have true friends. They just play and pretend to be friends with other people. There is no doubt they succeed in it, but they spend so much time listening to other's worries and troubles nd entertaining them that they practically do not have time for themselves. In addition, it is difficult and almost impossible to relax, discuss interesting issues and just be oneself.

To sum up, I am totally agree with the statement that "a friend in need is a friend indeed". I am sure that my close friends will always help me and ever betray or turn me down. However, a large number of friends does not allow to establish close and deep relationships.

Votes
Average: 3.3 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-04-30 enassar 33 view
Essays by user enassar :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 25, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...e oneself. To sum up, I am totally agree with the statement that 'a friend ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 198, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...d ever betray or turn me down. However, a large number of friends does not allow to establish clo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 239, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'establishing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: establishing
... large number of friends does not allow to establish close and deep relationships.
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, as to, for example, i think, in addition, no doubt, first of all, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 24.0651302605 199% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63392857143 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56804654062 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520833333333 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 5.43587174349 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 16.0721442886 156% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.4175212665 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 62.28 106.682146367 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.44 20.7667163134 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.48 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 8.67935871743 230% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278148922621 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845338981672 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0985826005018 0.0667982634062 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168549247003 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0988181175545 0.056905535591 174% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.1 13.0946893788 54% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 50.2224549098 150% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 11.3001002004 53% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.98 12.4159519038 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.87 8.58950901804 80% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.7795591182 65% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.