Some people say that at all levels of education from primary school to university too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills Do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Some people say that at all levels of education, from primary school to university, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills.
Do you agree or disagree?

It is true that there is a lot of time spent on teaching core subjects, and children can’t have enough time on learning a subject which has content related to soft skills. Personally, I totally agree with this opinion

The main reason for focusing so much time on practical learning in school is that there is a huge amount of theoretical knowledge in any subject. In some countries, their annual curricula are prioritized for more important subjects, so the reality is that they will possess a huge amount of knowledge. And there are huge obstacles for both pupils and teachers. While teachers will think about how to compete teaching their own subject which is mentioned on an annual study program, children also have to remember any lesson and study hard in order to get the best result in the final exam. As a result, some teachers, who serve in educating a subsidiary subject, won’t have enough time to lecture on any practical skill.

Another reason for describing this phenomenon is that children lack attention in some subjects which teach practical skills . Students often find it easy for them to concentrate on many core subjects because they are fascinating, which they can’t figure out on the hour lecture of the subsidiary subject. As a result, they won’t improve their practical skills because of not enough time. Moreover, Any subject which teaches about learning facts also has a competition, which is attracting many gifted students to participate in and it doesn’t happen in these subsidiary subjects. For instance, the international olympiad is one of the most popular competitions for
gifted students in a core subject

To conclude, not only do most educational structures have a priority in teaching fact, it causes many students to ignore the role of studying practical skills on subsidiary subjects. Consequently, I agree that it is a real problem for each country to resolve.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-03-14 simrankaursidhu 84 view
2021-12-30 minhhh123 73 view
2019-10-31 Kazimobarak 78 view
2018-07-10 SNEHA GANGWANI 77 view
Essays by user minhhh123 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 124, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...me subjects which teach practical skills . Students often find it easy for them to...
^^
Line 5, column 621, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...For instance, the international olympiad is one of the most popular competitions ...
^^
Line 5, column 666, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...one of the most popular competitions for gifted students in a core subject To ...
^^^
Line 8, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...udents in a core subject To conclude, not only do most educational structures ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, moreover, so, while, for instance, as a result, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08544303797 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75948975495 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506329113924 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.4510110294 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.916666667 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175409518756 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771675187176 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645041308404 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100201432563 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053361937183 0.056905535591 94% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.