Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills.
Do you agree or disagree?
The education system has always been a topic of debate for many people. The levels of education end up spending more time on theoretical knowledge more compared to practical knowledge. I agree with the statement to an extent, but there are also details I want to clarify.
Education is recognized as a vital to the future of any society in today's world and this the first reason. I feel education either theory facts or practical skills both are needed for a strong foundation. And our children from primary schooling to graduation are thought the theoretically more, in forms of textbooks, long notes, and exhaustive examinations to test memory than actual learning. Although these facts make them aware of previous experiences and mistakes to be avoided in the future. For instance, learning mathematics subject helps them understand the calculation mechanics and aid them in utilizing these facts into practical use for buying commodities or investing and managing finances better.
The second reason is it helps them evolve into a socially responsible citizen. Learning facts mitigates children in various phases of life. It grooms them socially, physically as well as mentally. Although the structure of education has to be balanced and these days many institutes have realized the importance and have started implementing it. Some such examples are the increasing real-life tasks and case studies given to MBAs students which help them analyze and solve problems faced by society.
Therefore, I conclude to disagree that only learning facts is emphasized on children's education pattern from their primary years till graduation level. In addition, I feel it is well balanced with good amount of exposure to the practical aspects of learning also.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-07 | sanjugohel | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | amanda.mosby | 11 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | amanda.mosby | 11 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | Tejwani | 11 | view |
| 2019-11-08 | Tejwani | 73 | view |
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree. Discuss both these views 56
- You recently received a letter from a friend asking for advice about whether to go to college or to try to get a job. You think he/she should get a job. Write a letter to this friend. In your letter: 1. Say why he/she would not enjoy going to college2. Ex 78
- In Britain, when someone gets old they often go to live in a home with other old people where there are nurses to look after them. Sometimes the government has to pay for this care.Who do you think should pay for this care, the government or the family?Gi 61
- Biometric: A revolution in payment systems 56
- Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary schools to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills.Do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 259, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...re to the practical aspects of learning also.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, therefore, well, as to, for instance, i feel, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1486.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32616487455 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81243953957 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627240143369 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8936521125 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0666666667 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86666666667 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177142442777 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0538988064932 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565249786787 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1126109857 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635676871331 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.