It is common perspective that much emphasis is placed on memorization of theoretical facts and not on helping students to acquire practical skills. I completely agree with this statement. This essay will discuss my points of view in upcoming paragraphs.
Many institutions focus make students learn facts, be it primary or tertiary education. One of the main reasons behind this practice is that the education system in most of the countries require students to learn theories to get good grades. Due to peer pressure and the desire to get top ranks makes the student focus more on memorizing the syllabus rather than trying to learn it practically. Moreover, in tertiary education, students have an abundance of information to learn which includes various types of essays, class presentations and many more. This overwhelms them and they are left with no time to give to practical learning.
Lack of emphasis on practical skills have many reason. Firstly, teaching practical skills costs a lot of money as various type of equipment is required to carry out the experiments such as chemicals, mechanical apparatus. Institutions avoid to invest money on such things. Furthermore, university students are always drowning in their course related theory assignments, which makes it hard for them to give time to practical study. Also, mostly theory classes are held every day of the week whereas practicals are conducted only once or twice a week. So this unsymmetrical distribution of time also causes lack of practical skills among students.
To conclude, both practical as well as theoretical skills are required to work or gain expertise in any field. So, equal emphasis should be put on both for the overall development of the student.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 43, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun reason seems to be countable; consider using: 'many reasons'.
Suggestion: many reasons
...ck of emphasis on practical skills have many reason. Firstly, teaching practical skills cos...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 236, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'avoid investing'.
Suggestion: avoid investing
...als, mechanical apparatus. Institutions avoid to invest money on such things. Furthermore, univ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 29, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...tudents. To conclude, both practical as well as theoretical skills are required to work...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, moreover, so, well, whereas, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1465.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21352313167 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8757178969 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608540925267 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.3495498795 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5625 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5625 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162131954293 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0523344996743 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406821283893 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0887463597441 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487945887665 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.