Some people say that the best way to improve Road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving or riding motorbikes To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Some people say that the best way to improve Road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving or riding motorbikes. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Driving recklessly and risking the life of other people has become a major cause of concern these days. Considering this, some echelons claim that the age limit for driving automobiles should certainly been increased as for them, this is the most effective method of ameliorating road safety. This essay would argue why accelerating the age to drive is an unnecessary initiative as accidents could take place in respective of age factor.

The primary reason as to why this advice has been given by these cohorts is the unauthorisation by which these young people drive. Owing to the fact that there are many an individual who does not attain an approval as a form of license, and putting life in danger of other expert drivers on the road. Resultantly, if the license would be provided to youngsters until a certain age they would learn to drive in a much potential way and pose no threat to others. As evidence a country like Japan only provides driving authorisation to individuals after the age of 20, which helped the country to decrease the rate of accidents by 35%.

Despite such initiatives, there are certain situations where accelerating the age of automobile driving would be an unnecessary step. Since mis-happenings on the roads do not take place by only a specific group of people. In other words, any person irrespective of their age can be a part of any fatal incidents. Consequently even if the age limit of driving is increased in these circumstances the road safety is still not guaranteed. To exemplify, a social editorial recently stated in their article that out of 300 accidents in 2016, almost 258 were executed by the adults. This article clearly elucidates that age has nothing to do with the road safety.

This essay argued that people who propose changing the age limit of operating vehicles be increased surely have flawed understanding of road safety. In my opinion, road on safety has nothing to be related to any potentiality of age because these incidents can take place by any individuals at any time.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-12-17 Justin Angel 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'individuals'?
Suggestion: individuals
...wing to the fact that there are many an individual who does not attain an approval as a fo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 135, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e driving would be an unnecessary step. Since mis-happenings on the roads do not take...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 314, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Consequently,
...e can be a part of any fatal incidents. Consequently even if the age limit of driving is inc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, so, still, as for, as to, in my opinion, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1698.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90751445087 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83475775248 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526011560694 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6309272004 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.2 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0666666667 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86666666667 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211813832423 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768866082474 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490093929512 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139203603652 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330739562436 0.056905535591 58% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.