It has long been a subject of discussion whether young ones who get extra money by weekly face fewer obtacles in their future life or not. In my opinion, the former notion has several elements that deserve attention, and I will explain why using pertinent arguments.
Children with their pocket money are able to manage expenses. In their childhood age, they become familiar with the importance of money in life. According to a survey conducted by Stanford University 60% of kids who have pocket spare money able to spend on important things while 30% of other children face difficulties in managing expenses later in life.
As an illustration, academic research done by the Australian government that youngsters have money for personal use and become more independent as they spend their money wisely and fulfil their dreams.
As a result, they become confident in life which is highly beneficial for tackling issues related to money in future.
In conclusion, from what we have discussed above, I personally believe that it would be wise to say that having pocket money weekly assists children to boost self-esteem and solve problems related to managing expenses.
- Write a letter to your friend from a different country Invite him her to a party at your home and include the following what the party is about give directions on how to get to your place suggest how to accommodate him her 100
- For many people the reason they work hard is to earn money To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Childhood obesity is becoming a serious problem in many countries What are the causes of this What solutions can be offered 73
- Some people think it is better for people to change their careers at least once in their life and do different kinds of jobs Do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- Some people think that school children need to learn practical skills such as car maintenance or bank account management along with the academic subjects at school To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 108, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...al for tackling issues related to money in future. In conclusion, from what we have ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 987.0 1615.20841683 61% => OK
No of words: 191.0 315.596192385 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16753926702 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 4.20363070211 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63947052229 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 176.041082164 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.649214659686 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 506.74238477 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7533631273 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.375 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288798786183 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129872545757 0.084324248473 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539849810298 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15452367037 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048968851499 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.