Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty, while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The growth of economic is a controversial problem in modern world. While some people argue it is the only possible way to abandon famine and poverty, whereas others dispute that we should forbid economic growth because it is gradually destroying the environment. In my opinion, I think that both statements have some reasonable argument and some illogical contention.
Although, economic development may have some great impact on the civilian’s lives but it is not the only factor controlling the proportion of destitution and starvation in the society. Economic growth may improve the living situation of citizens when the money value rises then people can afford their necessity. However, there are lots of other significant factors have remarkable effect on ending people’s poverty and hunger. For instance, the government’s policy of social welfare can enhance civilian’s living condition effectively and in a shorter time than economic growth.
In an environmentalist’s perspective, the growing tendency of economic can bring out a lot of disadvantages with the Mother Nature but we cannot depend on that reason to ban economic growth and denied all of its benefits. It is clear that the development of economic makes the deforestation becomes worse than ever and the air, noise and water pollution are more common. Nevertheless, it is inequality to blame the environment destruction only on the economic growth while there are abundant factors causing pollution such as transportation, edifice construction.
To conclude, people nowadays debate whether economic growth is the only solution to end poverty and famine or economic development is destroying the environment and need to be stopped. However, I disagree and agree partly with both arguments and highly recommend that instead of stopping economic growth, we should develop economic in a stable and environment-friendly way to reduce poverty and hunger and contemporaneously decline the negative impacts on the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-30 | minhanh2410 | 78 | view |
- Task 1: The information below gives details about household income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in one UK city in 2010 and 2013. 73
- The charts below show the reasons why people travel to work by bicycle or by car.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of the old houses in the local areas, while others think that people should have freedom to build houses of their own styles. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- The chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the 73
- The chart below shows the annual pay (thousands of US dollars) for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2004. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 341, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ements have some reasonable argument and some illogical contention. Although, ...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...transportation, edifice construction. To conclude, people nowadays debate whet...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, then, whereas, while, for instance, i think, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 8.3376753507 300% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1719.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63606557377 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4230513144 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567213114754 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.5736368717 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.25 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4166666667 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383267987813 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147521122341 0.084324248473 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719664263289 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245332050178 0.151304729494 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681773004392 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.