The media should include more stories which report good news. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
With the skyrocketing development of technology in the century of 4.0 industrial revolutions, mass media plays a significant role in informing civilians and influencing people’s prejudice about daily issues. As a result, many people expect that positive news coverage is more regularly mentioned in all media platforms in today society. In my opinion, I partly concur with this idea of including more stories with great news because it still contains some drawbacks that need to be solved and consider.
On the one hand, the mainstream media should increase the proportion of effectively pleasing news. Most people concede with what they see and read in their favorite TV programs or trusted newspaper. Thanks to the press’s power toward their watchers, the government can partly influence citizen’s mindset and attitude by carrying a story intensively. Consequently, making great news the front page headline can significantly affect people’s observation and sentiment toward their current government which brings back a more stable political statement. Additionally, informing positive news more often can be an effective educational method which helps civilian more understanding and easily following the moral lessons in that good news.
On the other hand, the media have to consider how much is enough percentage of the stories reported good information. In every society, both positive and negative sides co-exist and the media’s responsibility is keeping people abreast as detailed and honest as they can of all daily news. Although increasing positive news can bring back some undeniable benefits, the media have to committee demonstrating enough tragedy and negative news that happen daily. So citizens can be aware and avoid involving in these catastrophes deliberately. Moreover, if the media shows citizens too much great news instead of the daily negative true, people will not have the motivation to change and eliminate these problems that they have to face.
To conclude, while raising the stories informed great news is beneficial in many perspectives, I firmly concur that the media also need to balance the proportion for all kinds of news including bad news and tragedy. I would highly recommend that the media should act as a watchdog and continue report all the significant both bad and good news in the world today while slightly increasing the amount of great news.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | sepide1367 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | martinestefan | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | kiana | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | Niusha | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | lydunhien | 61 | view |
- Many university students live with their families, while other live away from home because their universities are in different places. What are the advantages and disadvantages of both situations? 67
- More and more people are becoming seriously overweight. Some people think a solution can be to increase the price of fattening foods. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- People are living in a ‘throwaway society’, using things for a short time and then throwing them away. What are the causes of this? What problems does it lead to? 78
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty, while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, moreover, so, still, while, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2051.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 375.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46933333333 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96018738146 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 633.6 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.203703545 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.733333333 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276865205723 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0976621969121 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595663416056 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175413893056 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383922475342 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.