Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end workld poverty and hunger. Others say that economic growth is causing damage to the environment and should be stopped now. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Whether or not economic growth is the only means of counteracting issues of poverty and hunger has always been a matter of serious debates. Some people, including me, me included, as well as me, are strongly in favour, whereas others tend to contradict them. The idea provokes strong arguments, which will be discussed in this essay.
On the one hand, economic growth, beyond doubt, inevitably leads to more working places engendered for employees of various professional levels. For instance, the recent emergence of such services as online food and taxi facilities has generated immerse demand for drivers and even couriers, which seems to be a tremendous mitigation of the problem. Secondly, strong economies and prosperous countries, in general, seem to be able to provide better care for those in need. For example, having extra fund enables countries to arrange special shelters for the homeless and free meal to counteract shortage of food. Finally, being a result of economic growth, modern agricultural technology, including innovative fertilizers and smart irrigation systems, appears to be able to significantly decrease prices for fruits and vegetables, thereby rendering such products more accessible for people on a low income.
On the other hand, however modern technology may be called this day, its serious reliance on energy and, in turn, on fossil fuel often leads to serious environmental problems. Carbon emissions, which are inevitable burning coal or petrol, and vast landfills are all gruesome realities of the contemporary world. Furthermore, growing automation of work people used to do by hand may reduce job opportunities for the most vulnerable employees. Competing with robots is becoming more and more difficult and, in the long term, can exacerbate the problem even further.
All in all, although the detrimental effect on the environment seems to be possible negative outcome of economic growth, I would claim that it is rather tractable and, in the face of such serious problems as poverty and hunger, it might be even deemed incidental.
- More and more people are opting for ready-made food instead of freshly cooked food. Do this development has more advantages over disadvantages? 67
- The cultures of many coutries around the world become more similar than they used to be. What are the reasons for this trend? Is it positive or negative? 61
- Nowadays in many countries woman have full time jobs. therefore, it is logical to share household task evenly between man and woman. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement. 11
- You and your colleagues recently attended a foreign language training course organized by your company Now you want to do some more language training Write a letter to your manager In the letter how you and your colleagues felt about the course why you al 79
- A colleague at work is organizing a goodbye party which you are not able to attend. Write a latter to him/her.In the letter you should:Explain reason why you cannot attendgood memories you have spenthow you will stay in touch 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'Whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: Whether
Whether or not economic growth is the only means of co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, for example, for instance, in general, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38226299694 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86707971257 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648318042813 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.0069698019 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.384615385 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1538461538 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1538461538 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170209936394 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583737178554 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612323848979 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112316191224 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554393702664 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.43 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.