Some people say that government should build sport facilities for professional athletes. Others believe that such facilities should be open to everyone. Discuss both views with your opinion.
In recent years, there is a general concern about health and how to improve it. Although there is a part of the society requesting state-of-the-art amenities for élite athletes, some others argue that such facilities should be available for the public as well. Notwithstanding that I agree that using the taxes to build high performance sports facilities for athletes is a profit for the country, I cannot ignore that all those taxes have being paid for the citizens, and subsequently they have the right to use it. In this essay I would like to account for both perspectives with my standpoint.
On the one hand, I believe that spend the government budget in building sport centers for professional sportsperson is necessary for a strong and healthier population. Providing basic services, such as sport complexes, hospitals, roads and schools, helps to determine quality of life that most citizens will have. For instance, a survey prepared by the Olympic committee, display that nations that invert in sports have in average a 35% higher performance in the games comparing with others. Consequently, people see those athletes as role models to be followed, and this increase the general wellness.
On the other hand, that those sports centers can only be used by high performers and not for amateurs and taxpayers is not the correct decision. Moreover, recent research from the University of Madrid shows that there is a relation between the money that countries spend in sport programs and the reduction in health and care services. In fact, the government of Canada for instance, saved in 2018 a 15% on medical treatments related with elderly. Therefore, it is a profitable investment for governments.
In conclusion, there is a general benefit in bring to life those technological advance amenities, for sport players and non-professionals and in guarantee public investments in those activities. From my point of view, I am totally agreed with the second statement because using those resources will improve the collective wellness.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-21 | ILDEFONSO PÉREZ | 78 | view |
- You play a team sport with some friends. Last week a member of the team had an accident and wasn't able to play with you at the weekend. You decide to write to him in hospital, telling him about the match.Write a letter to your friend. In your letter 73
- Some people say that government should build sport facilities for professional athletes. Others believe that such facilities should be open to everyone. Discuss both views with your opinion. 78
- Today large shopping center and supermarkets are more common than small local shops. Is this a negative or positive development? 73
- A friend you made while you were studying abroad has written to ask you for help in finding a job in your country. You have heard about a job in a local company that might be suitable for his/her.Write a letter to this friend. In your letter-Tell your fri 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In recent years, there is a general conc...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...profitable investment for governments. In conclusion, there is a general benef...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1723.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23708206687 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00027868613 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562310030395 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1176064105 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.071428571 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289510658951 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882095761676 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699426550228 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160488553051 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.070558988493 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.