Because of too much equipment and stuff, living or working places are more likely to be messed up. The matter of how to keeping our places has sparked controversial debates. In this essay, I will discuss the importance of being tidy and well-orgıned.
Those who claim the advantages of the above statement show significant reasons. Firstly, having such attitudes, not only does it avoids distractions but also avoid forgetness. Since people are programmed to do regular movements they will be more obvious in many aspects. For example, because I have been so tidy so far, constantly I can not find my clothes or some devices. Therefore because people do the activities they used to, it will lead them to have more concentration.
Another perspective on these statements is the Loss of equipment. As long as people are well-organized, the loss will not occur, which may lead to a waste of money. The best example of this will be the workshops. It is an undeniable fact that most industries are managed well. Thus, Loss is minimized even totally disposed of. For instance, the time I was working in the school’s workshop people didn’t mind to put equipment where did they take it from, so that we had to buy wrenches again and again to replace them. Nowadays, money is playing an enormous role in our lives, it would be certainly will increase the permanence of the equipment which enables us to save money.
In conclusion, in both aspects of views that i made above paragraphs will be advantageous on finding people’s need easily, as well as they will be less considered of losing money. They will feel the sense of having the stuff longer.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 129, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'avoid'?
Suggestion: avoid
...having such attitudes, not only does it avoids distractions but also avoid forgetness....
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 129, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'avoid'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: avoid
...having such attitudes, not only does it avoids distractions but also avoid forgetness....
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 176, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...distractions but also avoid forgetness. Since people are programmed to do regular mov...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 374, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...an not find my clothes or some devices. Therefore because people do the activities they u...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 46, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...nclusion, in both aspects of views that i made above paragraphs will be advantage...
^
Line 4, column 101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ragraphs will be advantageous on finding people's need easily, as well as th...
^^
Line 4, column 130, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... on finding people's need easily, as well as they will be less considered of losing ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1378.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86925795053 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85444574396 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618374558304 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.5697746094 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.0588235294 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6470588235 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76470588235 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0671147473818 0.244688304435 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0237324120453 0.084324248473 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0257540834524 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0474494083662 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330305121417 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.0946893788 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.