Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to cinema Others say that to be fully enjoyed films need to be seen in cinema Discuss both views and give your own opinion

It is often argued that going to the cinema is the thing of the past and cutting-edge technology such as smartphones may enable people to enjoy watching films on a small screen. Personally, I believe that seeing films on a big screen would be more amusing.
To begin with, advanced technology comes in useful when it comes to choosing where to watch movies. This is because streaming service provides their audience with a wide range of different films at whatever time is needed. It would mean that to catch the latest box-office hit it does not mean to go to the overcrowded cinema, what is really necessary is instant access to the Internet. Furthermore, people obviously no longer have to stick to a strict schedule of theatres and rely on agreements cinemas with film companies about releasing their products. The main reason is the ability of the streaming companies such as Netflix, Amazon to record releases for further watching and the opportunity to create a suitable schedule for users.
Nevertheless, seeing a film on a big screen would mean a higher quality of entertainment level. Firstly, the better sound and a huge screen which are directly responsible for grasping the state-of-the-art computer effects as well sound effects. However, although many home cinemas can fulfil viewers needs related to sound and pictures, these systems appear to cost a fortune and still unaffordable for many people. Secondly, lots of cinemas use up-to-the-minute features to maintain a high quality of pastime for their visitors. For instance, soft and comfortable chairs with adjustment, fresh air created by the cooling system and tasty beverages and popcorn. Indeed, all these characteristics make sure that people would be satisfied.
In conclusion, although many people may vary in their opinion where films must be watched, I think that see movies on a big screen significantly impressive than on a phone screen.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 306, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "needs related" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'relating' or 'to be related'.
Suggestion: relating; to be related
...y home cinemas can fulfil viewers needs related to sound and pictures, these systems ap...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, really, second, secondly, so, still, well, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1608.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13738019169 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91006087685 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600638977636 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4627025404 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.857142857 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3571428571 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7142857143 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201290691616 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664446026247 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534039616005 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1339419894 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411084330794 0.056905535591 72% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.