Some people support modern developments in agriculture such as factory farming and creation of new types of fruits and vegetables. However, other people oppose this view.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
There is currently a contentious argument between technological advancements in agriculture where factory farming is becoming a norm and traditional farming practices. While some people believe that factory farming is more convenient and has more advantages but others believe that ancient agricultural techniques were much better. In this essay I will discuss both the views and give my opinion.
Beyond any qualms there are myriads of logical thoughts that prove the ability of factory farming to produce better quality and quantity of crops than the normal farming. Firstly, it allows easy access to produce genetically modifies food that gives a better shelf life to the farm produce and ensures that the produce will sustain longer in the market. It also helps to add more variety of fruits and vegetables. Moreover, in factory farming the annual output of the final yield remains unaltered by the extreme weather conditions such as drought and floods.
On the contrary, others believe that industrial farming has led to loss of income and the only source of livelihood for the small scale farmers. While land farming allows growers to earn bread and butter for their families but with the advent of industrial farming practices it might become difficult for them as their farm produce is directly dependent on the weather conditions. Moreover, the land farming produces better variety of organic produce as compared to the factory farming.
In conclusion, I believe that factory farming will benefit the higher socio-economic strata of the society while the poor and middle class people will lose their jobs and source of income. Therefore a middle way should be devised so that factory farming helps to increase the quality and quantity of the agricultural produce but not at the expanse of affecting the livelihood of the land farmers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-21 | ankita.hpgdc | 52 | view |
- When we can see films on phones that what the need of going to the cinemas is Others say that to fully enjoy the films it should be seen in cinemas Give both views and give your opinion 56
- Some people think that it is better to educate boys and girls in separate schools Other however believe that boys and girls benefit more from attending mixed schools Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Some people say that advertising encourages us to buy things that we really do not need Others say that advertisements tell us about new products that may improve our lives Which viewpoint do you agree with Give reasons for your answer and include any rel 78
- Due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarket in some countries many small local business are unable to compete Some people think that the closure of local business will bring about the death of local communities To what extent do you agree or 73
- Some people believe that having a conversation on a mobile phone in a public or crowded place should be banned Others feel that we should be able to talk wherever we like Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 190, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...l lose their jobs and source of income. Therefore a middle way should be devised so that ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 398, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing the livelihood of the land farmers.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1558.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24579124579 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63061454156 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535353535354 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2289929847 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.833333333 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205929081125 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839171654885 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658452743515 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136284290936 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0883463859442 0.056905535591 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.