You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Write about the following topic:
Air traffic is increasingly leading to more noise, pollution, and airport constuction. One reason for this is the growth in low-cost passenger flights, often to holiday destinations.
Some people say that government should try to reduce air traffic by taxing it more heavily.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.
Write at least 250 words.
Currently there is a contentious argument over whether the government should impose taxes in order to reduce air traffic or not. I believe that taxing the aviation industry would help in reducing the number of low-cost passenger flights. In this essay I will discuss that why I agree that the government should impose heavy taxes to reduce air traffic.
Beyond any qualms there are myriads of rationale reasons that prove that air traffic is unnecessarily causing environmental damage. Airports construction is causing deforestation while air traffic is causing noise pollution and air pollution. Low-cost passenger flights destined to holiday destinations is causing destruction of flora and fauna of the tourist places and irreparable environmental damage. For example, beaches of Goa are often scattered with broken beer bottles, polythene waste and plastic bottles floating in oceans threatening marine ecosystem. Taxing air industry will increase the cost of flights which will reduce the unnecessary tourist inflow to famous places. While the tourism industry might suffer but the amount of environmental damage in the form of air, water and noise pollution would be reduced significantly.
On the contrary, some people believe that taxing the aviation industry will cause economic loss as tourism industry brings business opportunities for the locals living in tourist places. However, I believe that loss of a source of income is a temporary issue but destruction of ecosystem caused by overcrowded tourist places and environmental damage is an irreversible and permanent issue. To prevent extinction of rare species and to preserve the ecological balance it is high time that humans understand the responsibility towards our mother Earth.
In conclusion, I believe that aviation industry is a boon for the economic and financial growth but it causes irreparable environmental damage. If we want our successors to enjoy this beautiful nature with fresh environment and healthy marine life it is our responsibility to keep it clean and healthy. Would this generation understand this issue? Still remains a question.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-18 | ankita.hpgdc | 67 | view |
| 2021-01-18 | ankita.hpgdc | 73 | view |
- For many young people today shopping is their favorite free time activity Why do you think this has happened Should young people be encouraged to do different activities in their free time 73
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write about the following topic It has been claimed that workers over 50 are not responsive to rapidly changing ideas in the modern workplace and that for this reason younger workers are to be preferred To wh 73
- Due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarket in some countries many small local business are unable to compete Some people think that the closure of local business will bring about the death of local communities To what extent do you agree or 73
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write about the following topic University education should be free to everyone regardless of income To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from 78
- Some people think that developed countries have a higher responsibility to combat climate change than developing countries Others believe that all countries should have the same responsibilities towards protecting the environment Discuss both these views 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, still, then, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1802.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52760736196 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99974279701 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546012269939 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8776113446 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.625 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201212967569 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688638861366 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521375528827 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114151609079 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0705845220914 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.