Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Some would argue that the University should only teach the subjects such as science and computers, as these subjects will be helpful in the coming years, while some say that students should be allowed to study the subjects of their own choice. Although a self selection of the curriculum will be more interesting to the students, I believe studying technical subjects like science and computers will give them the better jobs.
On the one hand, allowing students to choose their subjects could be an interesting combination of subjects. This is to say that the students often get bored when the topic of the lecture is out of their interest. If the students are provided with an option to choose the subjects that they would like to study, they will attend the lectures with more concentration. For example, as per the recent study done by the Oxford University revealed that 57% of the university dropout students left their course because they were forced to study subjects that they were not interested in. Despite this, I believe that this approach should not be preferred because students brain is not fully developed and they may choose subjects that are not in demand in the job market.
In the other hand, studying science and IT subjects are going to help the students to get the nice jobs. This is because the mentioned domains are having various developments every year and the demand for the workforce with updated qualifications also increases. As a result, all students studying such subjects will get a good job in a multinational company. For example, as per the placements statistics published by the Education Department of India, the students with science and technology background have 100% job record since last years. Therefore, I believe students should be allowed to study only such subjects at the University level.
To conclude, despite the fact that self selection of subjects could be an interesting combination for the students, it's better for students to study courses that are going to be helpful in coming years because they can achieve a good career.
- You recently bought a piece of equipment for your kitchen but it did not work. You phoned the shop but no action was taken. Write a letter to the shop manager. In your letter• describe the problem with the equipment• explain what happened when you pho 89
- Many young children have unsupervised access to the internet and are using the internet to socialise with others This can lead to a number of dangerous situations which can be threatening for children what problems do children face when going online witho 61
- Some people prefer to live in a house, while others feel that there are more advantages to living in an apartment.Are there more advantages than disadvantages of living in a house compared with living in an apartment? 73
- News / Media has an influence on our life and some people think it can have a negative effect. Do you agree or disagree? Give your own opinion. 61
- Some people say that now we can watch films at home on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to the cinemas Others say that to be fully enjoyed films need to be seen in a cinema Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... subjects that they would like to study, they will attend the lectures with more ...
^^
Line 5, column 385, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'placements'' or 'placement's'?
Suggestion: placements'; placement's
...tional company. For example, as per the placements statistics published by the Education D...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1745.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01436781609 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64621785806 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.445402298851 0.561755894193 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.6464998499 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.230769231 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7692307692 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38461538462 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.425484738656 0.244688304435 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173972658821 0.084324248473 206% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120176263278 0.0667982634062 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.283070496185 0.151304729494 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0926498655564 0.056905535591 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.