Some people think the best way to solve global environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel.
To what extent do you agree?
There is an issue about the influence of oil price on the ecology. Some ecologists suggest that boosting the gasoline price is the most effective method to improve the poor condition of the environment. This essay disagrees with their point of view.
Let us start with reasons why some ecologists state that a rise in the fuel price will bring the greatest benefit to the environment. The first reason is that the number of cars will decline. The traffic on the roads will gradually diminish, because a growing number of drivers will be unable to purchase prohibitively costly fuel. As a result, the amount of carbon dioxide in the air will decrease significantly. Another reason is that the importance of alternative energy will grow. More companies will begin to research into the environmentally friendly sources of energy, and, subsequently, they will become competitive in the energy market. Furthermore, updated traditional cars will produce less gases. They will also transform conventional engines into energy-efficient ones, so that driver will be save on fuel and reduce the concentration of harmful fumes in the atmosphere.
However, some scientists of global warming argue that the high cost of petrol will have insignificant effect on environmental pollution. Firstly, most of the oil companies will supply the energy market with more fuel. The higher the price for oil will become, the more areas of oil these companies will start to develop, so many investors will choose to invest in petroleum market. Secondly, Petroleum producers will also hamper the development of other sources of fuel. They may create a great deal of obstacles to green-energy companies, since they will be reluctant to lose their share in the fuel industry. Moreover, the complete replacement of traditional cars will linger for long time. The majority car drivers, who are poor people, will not abandon their cars immediately for ecofriendly ones, so the improvement of air quality will stretch for many years.
In conclusion, although some ecologists advocate that expensive petroleum will be the best solution to deal with the polluted ecology, I think that it will only course the minimum positive impact on it for the above mentioned reasons.
- Due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarkets in some countries, many small, local businesses are unable to compete. Some people think that the closure of local business bring about the death of local communities.To what extent do you agree o 73
- Today, majority of children are raised by their grandparents. To what extent do you think it affects the whole family? 11
- In many countries, very few people read newspapers or follow the news on TV.What do you think are the causes of this?What solutions can you suggest? 78
- In western countries there is an increasing number of couples choosing to have no children.What are the advantages and disadvantages to couples having no children? 61
- The younger generation is mainly responsible for the latest technological developments. How far do you agree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 698, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun gases is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
..., updated traditional cars will produce less gases. They will also transform convent...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, i think, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 7.85571142285 306% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1886.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23888888889 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87652804267 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547222222222 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7375382853 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2631578947 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9473684211 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.31578947368 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0799597214558 0.244688304435 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0312690249635 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390262223976 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0584970531156 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00930856151904 0.056905535591 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.