Some people think that certain old buildings are more worth preserving than the other ones Which types of old buildings should be preserved Do you think that the advantages of preserving these old buildings outweigh the disadvantages

Essay topics:

Some people think that certain old buildings are more worth preserving than the other ones. Which types of old buildings should be preserved? Do you think that the advantages of preserving these old buildings outweigh the disadvantages?

Some people think that it is more crucial to preserve certain old buildings than others ones. This essay will give examples of some that should be preserved, and offer my perspectives about whether its advantages outweigh the disadvantages.
There are types of old buildings that require preservation. for example, historical monuments, churches, tombs, or houses where notables used to live. those often have cultural values and are considered as evidence, proving the existence and growth of generations in different periods. Governments also have policies to preserve buildings that are used for military purposes since they are where convert military operations took place and opponents don’t know about their existence, therefore they still retain their values and might be used in the future.
Although preserving these types of old buildings brings in some disadvantages, for example, requiring investments for reconstruction or dealing with environmental damages resulting from visitors, I believe that it is worth preserving them due to their great benefits. Firstly, regarding historical heritage sites, countries could earn a huge sum from tourists traveling there each year, which is then in turn used for erection. in addition, governments might also be successful in promoting cultural awareness for locals and help to put those places on the map, hence raising their profile in the world. in terms of old buildings used for specialized purposes, preservation can ensure that confidential information is protected carefully without being revealed and still be able to use in need.
in conclusion, I agree with the view that certain old buildings should be preserved and strongly believe that this policy’s advantages outweigh the disadvantages.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by user minh phương ph… :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 60, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...ld buildings that require preservation. for example, historical monuments, churches...
^^^
Line 2, column 151, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Those
... or houses where notables used to live. those often have cultural values and are cons...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...hich is then in turn used for erection. in addition, governments might also be suc...
^^
Line 3, column 604, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...nce raising their profile in the world. in terms of old buildings used for special...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...aled and still be able to use in need. in conclusion, I agree with the view that ...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...aled and still be able to use in need. in conclusion, I agree with the view that ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, if, regarding, so, still, then, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62172284644 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9708331677 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61797752809 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.3753199462 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.454545455 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2727272727 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0909090909 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.397459169562 0.244688304435 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172373945947 0.084324248473 204% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.176776842356 0.0667982634062 265% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.282884871209 0.151304729494 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111012183941 0.056905535591 195% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.