Some people think that the effective way to reduce industrial pollution is to tax the companies which cause them. Others think that there are better ways to do so. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Industrial pollution is the biggest threat to our Environment today. As per the recent survey, there has been an increase of 27 per cent in Industries globally which has made the situation worse. Some people argue that the most effective way to curb the contamination caused by factories is to tax them while the other says that there are alternative methods which could be used as a solution. In the below paragraphs I will elucidate both the viewpoints and conclude it with my opinion.
Governments around the world are introducing taxing the factories which are contributing to pollution. This method has not been successful in developing nations which face issues like corruption where factory owners bribe the government officials and do not pay the taxes. As per a recent survey was done by economic times around 70 per cent of the factories in developing nations are contributing to an increase in carbon emissions and evading the laws by not paying taxes.
Similarly, on the other hand, there are a plethora of ways which can be introduced to stop contamination of environment the preponderant one being the introduction of an incentive plan for factories which adhere to the least amount of carbon emission as per the rules and regulations set out by the government. This will not only help in reducing the carbon and toxic waste reduction but also motivate firms, for instance, in countries like China and Japan where corporate tax amounts to 37% per year if the factories meet the carbon emissions level they get an incentive as a reduction of the corporate taxes. Additionally, similar steps are being taken by the Indian government where we see a proliferation of carbon emissions and toxic waste whereby this toxic waste is converted to electricity by factories and government buys it a higher market price from the firms.
To conclude as per the arguments mentioned below though taxation of factories may be able to reduce the pollution. In my opinion, introducing incentive plans is a more effective way to motivate corporates to reduce industrial pollution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-29 | sarab.rathor | 84 | view |
- A person has found and sent back your lost driving licenceWrite a letter and thank himExplain why it is importantHow he/she foundAnd say how to thank him/her 56
- You have lost an item of value on train.Write a letter to the railway company. In your letter•Describe the item•Explain where and when you left it•Say what action you would like the company to take 84
- you bought a new home recently and you want to hire an interior decorator. write a letter to interior decorator seeking information about his services.in your letter;let him know how you came to know about his work or name.specify about your home.discuss 73
- An English speaking friend is coming to spend a week in your hometown. Write a letter to your friend. In your letter:. offer to find a place to stay. give suggestions abut what to do in a week.. inform about the clothes to be brought. 73
- A Canadian friend recently sent you a present by post. You want to thank him/her.Write a letter to your friend. In your letter-Say how you felt when you received the present-Describe what you like about it-Explain how you will use the presentTruly delight 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, similarly, so, while, for instance, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1740.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05813953488 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91239030809 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520348837209 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 559.8 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.7552467388 49.4020404114 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.0 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6666666667 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167974479069 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734070036852 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714826180768 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121882927353 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0812462143722 0.056905535591 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.66 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.