Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally Discuss both sides and give your opinion

Solving environmental issues on a global scale not nationally is a subject which provokes both great enthusiasm as well as stark opposition, and at times these two become somewhat blurred. There are strong arguments on both sides of the debate, which we will discuss here.
On the one hand, those who support solving environmental matter globally say that it renders a number of benefits ranging from getting help from UNO on globalisation to educating countries about managing the environmental problem efficiently. Besides, they claim that if the global organisations made it compulsory for the countries to ban plastic bags, will they able to reduce pollution. Recent surveys suggest that during pandemic the amount of air pollution reduced in terms of emitting less carbon dioxide by vehicle seem to bear testimony in this view.
Conversely, however, people who support environmental issues should be handled nationally point to easy management on the national level, which can have control on countries law and order by implementing strict laws and issue penalties if someone is not following. For example, imposing restrictions on the factory’s wastage dumping in the sea can attribute to save sea life. Moreover, they think that it is by persuading the community to follow the rules that they can save the world by devoting their effort in preventing the world from global warming.
Overall, it appears to me that the stronger argument is in favour of solving environmental matter globally, with all the advantages of getting strict regulations for the countries to implement it and supporting the developing countries, on an international level, who are not really concerned about environmental loss. After all, saving the world should be our priority, not destroying it.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...ct which provokes both great enthusiasm as well as stark opposition, and at times these tw...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...tional level, which can have control on countries law and order by implementing strict la...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, conversely, however, if, moreover, really, so, thus, well, after all, for example, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33687943262 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95963361164 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617021276596 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.7290565107 49.4020404114 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.5 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198832057807 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697251455176 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489833289375 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11619271675 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404992082496 0.056905535591 71% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.