In an increasingly technology-driven world, society has become accustomed to the instant and easy access to almost everything. While many people believe knowledge acquaint could be performed online so the government should not spend more money on the libraries, the others urge the governments constitute more since they still tend to enjoy learning activity in the public libraries. The essay will discuss both sides of the argument in detail and explain why the governments need to allocate money on libraries' construction.
The contemporary internet has already transferred a tremendous number of printed documents into the electrical form with the intelligent indexes.It can also provide several utilities to allow readers to have better experiences. You can speak just a few keywords of document you want to Siri, and then it will sort it out instantly. With the latest multi-dimensional joint-term correlation, you even could read Interstellar and Einstein's Physics theory simultaneously and seamlessly. However, you could only find any documents without copyright concerned online. So you have to go to the library for the copyright publications.
The modern libraries still ensure knowledge and technology are available to everyone. Especially the people, who do not know how to use the internet or do not have internet access, are willing to enjoy learning in the libraries. Unlike the traditional libraries, the modern libraries will support the readers to seek documents with computer assistance. The libraries will collect all publications according to customers' request, society demanding and academic standards, so you can inquire any documents could not find online. Another responsibility of the libraries will arrange extracurricular activities to supplement students knowledge which cannot perform in the class.
As the number of Internet users continues to increase drastically, the public libraries are becoming challenged. This essay discussed why online learning can be such an efficient process but why learning in public libraries can be such a knowledgeable process. In conclusion, governments should allocate more funds to construct and renew libraries to reach educational purpose.
- Advertising encourages people to buy in quantity rather to consider quality. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- some people think that government should provide library in every town. with the increase in internet, some people think that new libraries could be a waste of money. discuss you opinions. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...d be performed online so the government shouldnt spend more money on the libraries, the ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 501, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'libraries'' or 'library's'?
Suggestion: libraries'; library's
...e governments need to allocate money on libraries construction. The contemporary inte...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 114, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...to everyone. Especially the people, who dont know how to use the internet or dont ha...
^^^^
Line 6, column 151, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ho dont know how to use the internet or dont have internet access, are willing to en...
^^^^
Line 8, column 379, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...libraries to reach educational purpose.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, still, then, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1889.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75914634146 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20036428762 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582317073171 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8926397732 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.117647059 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2941176471 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.35294117647 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249231245796 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757861425446 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0331016547659 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127482940227 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437118565073 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.