Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and this money could be better spent elsewhere.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Governments have a plethora of areas to manage and a limited reserve of money for investment. In such a scenario, it becomes challenging to maintain the right balance of funding across departments. In this regard, some proponents have a notion that authorities must not spend any more on the arts, rather it should utilize this money in other developments such as health, education etc. However, I favor that art is essential for our culture and deserves a reasonable funding for its persistence and preservation.
There are myriad of reasons why arts is vital. One of the conspicuous reason is that it gives life to our culture. Looking back to the primitive times, we observe that our ancestors used drawings, paintings, engravings and sculptures to demonstrate the culture of the historical age. Since then it has been in existence, and even today we utilize its potential to showcase our cultural values. This could be best illustrated by an Indian painting that expressed youngsters touching the feet of their elders, apprise the values, respect, and feelings intact in the Indian community for their elders. Plausibly, in the absence of arts, it would be impossible to express cultural values and feelings freely.
On the other hand, it is perceived that the government has other enormous problems to resolve such as rising unemployment, threats to terrorism, poverty and deteriorating health which demand greater funding. For example, the world is being attacked by new allergies and diseases frequently which require greater research and money to manufacture vaccines and antidotes. Thus, a compromise in these areas would have a visible impact on our lives.
To conclude, arts has its own precious place in the society and non-funding to this department would have a significant value loss to the cultures and beliefs that people possess. Whereas, the other sectors demand a limitless money to cope up with uprising challenges, so the idealistic solution is to sagaciously decide a reasonable amount for arts and use the rest for other functions.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-10-03 | Ankita7443 | 89 | view |
2019-07-31 | preet kaur | 73 | view |
2019-07-31 | preet kaur | 67 | view |
2019-06-03 | sharmaisha | 61 | view |
2019-03-19 | H@rry | 78 | view |
- Both The Poor And The Rich Find Accessibility Into University Difficult. Do you agree or disagree? 11
- Learning English at school is often seen as more important than learning local languages. If these are not taught, many are at risk of dying out.In your opinion, is it important for everyone to learn English? Should we try to ensure the survival of local 67
- Some people think that it should be compulsory for people to retake their driving test every 5 years What are the advantages and disadvantages of doing this 85
- People often believe that great musicians are born and not made. Do you agree that we are born with much of our ability or are there other factors as family, environment that determine success. 84
- You work at home and have a problem with a piece of equipment that you use for your job.Write a letter to the shop or company which supplied the equipment. In your letter•describe the problem with the equipment•explain how this problem is affecting yo 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'maintaining'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: maintaining
...such a scenario, it becomes challenging to maintain the right balance of funding across dep...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 215, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'limitless money'.
Suggestion: limitless money
...sess. Whereas, the other sectors demand a limitless money to cope up with uprising challenges, so...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, then, thus, whereas, as to, for example, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1733.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21987951807 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8987908617 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593373493976 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0520080257 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.533333333 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1333333333 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141206414826 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0433253566093 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402213224998 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0859138899368 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029236788541 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.