Some people think that government is wasting money on the arts, and that this money could be spent elsewhere. To what extant do you agree with this view?
Ancient and historic cities, they try to spend money on many things such as arts to catch tourists and encourage people to visit their country. Some people are with this step by putting money on the arts, while others believe that government is wasting this money, where it could be spent elsewhere.
On one hand, several people agree with the point that government is wasting money on arts more than other important resources. Citizens believe that this money can be spent for fighting corruption, where they won't increase taxes. New projects and development programs can be done such as, building train stations, renovation for highways and lighting the roads to avoid accidents during nights. Moreover, they can put this money to decrease pollution, by removing and recycling the garbage's from the roads, where their people will have a clean environment. For example, in Lebanon corruption is all over the country, people are facing many problems in way of living and the government is wasting money to improve arts and museums to attract tourists. In my opinion, I agree with this point where governments should look over its people needs.
On the other hand, several people think that wasting money on arts is a good step for their country to catch tourists. First, improving arts and rebuilding museums will attract tourists and open new job opportunities for the unemployment. Economically, shops and restaurants their work will rise, more tourists will spend their money. Art is a major attracting resource for people all over the world, it's an important income for many governments. However, each country tries to become the first tourist face in their region. For example, Paris is the most tourist city in Europe where the government spend a lot of resources to attract tourist to visit it from all the world to have a look at its architecture and arts. From my side, I disagree since government can waste money on important issues before art.
As a conclusion, different argues some are with and others against wasting money on arts. I agree with the point that money must be spent on developing their country and fulfill their people needs.
- Some people believe that to be successful at a sport you need a natural ability and others think that hard work and practice can make you successful. Discuss both views and give your opinion? 73
- You recently organized an all-day meeting for your company, which took place in a local hotel. In their feedback, participants at the meeting said that they liked the hotel, but they were unhappy about the food that was served for lunch.Write a letter to 73
- Some countries spend a lot of money to make bicycle usage easier. Why is this? Is the best solution to traffic congestion? 73
- Nowadays most green energy is becoming evermore prevalent in both developed and developing countries Some argue they greatly reduce costs and are better for the environment others believe they are a serious threat to energy security Discuss both views and 78
- Some people believe that to be successful at a sport you need a natural ability and others think that hard work and practice can make you successful. Discuss both views and give your opinion? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, moreover, so, while, for example, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1805.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01388888889 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52475246311 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483333333333 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5695137923 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.176470588 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1764705882 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94117647059 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364488274637 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140694773762 0.084324248473 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135626301229 0.0667982634062 203% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.294027163911 0.151304729494 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119909997191 0.056905535591 211% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.