A multitude of parents reckon that it is favourable for their kids to mature in urban areas, while others assume that living in rural areas is more advisable. This essay will discuss the demerits and merits of both locations.
In the first place, the predominant advantage of living in the civic regions is that these places provide young generation the first-rate education. Children can take admission in renowned schools, which assist them to enrich their knowledge and manifest their talents. Because in prominent schools, they get access to high-quality system: prestigious schools, institutions with qualified staffs, state-of-the-art equipment, etc. Also, a big city often devotes a wider choice of entertainment and extra-curricular activities to the children. With a plethora of appealing locations, such as cinemas, amusement parks, supermarkets, etc. the children are satisfied and they will have a great time to relax. This plays a crucial role in bringing them the positive energy and contented childhood. However, numerous drawbacks of child-rearing in cities still exist. Upbringing in the metropolitan zones might be arduous since the crime rate is increasing. Therefore, their offsprings can get into serious trouble like being kidnapped, bullied and so on. Because of living in highly competitive environment, children have to become more outstanding and multi-talented. Hence, they have been put under high pressure since the very young age and some of them are proved to be vulnerable health problems as well as physical health issues.
From the other side, raising children in the countryside has some brightsides and downsides. Firstly, the fresh air and clean water in the suburban regions play a pivotal role to improve children's health. They need clean atmosphere to breathe, not the polluted air from the fumes of cars and factories of the modern city. Moreover, they spend more time hanging out, playing with friends or helping their parents with domestic chores instead of watching TV or playing video games. Accordingly, they learn how to work and live without any technological amenities. Oppositely, students can't get access to satisfactory or superb learning facilities and curriculum. Due to the less literate, in the future, when the kids grown up, they face unemployment problems.
In conclusion, growing up in cities and villages could be considered as beneficial or detrimental for children depending on how they are raised by parents and how well they are educated.
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 56
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 56
- Many factors motivate people in the workplace Of these money is the most important To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 78
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 583, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...logical amenities. Oppositely, students cant get access to satisfactory or superb le...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2116.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 391.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41176470588 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98399609649 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 176.041082164 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624040920716 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 641.7 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2110911888 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1818181818 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7727272727 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167266996703 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.041882581709 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425175333917 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104042162811 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0188065800689 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 78.4519038076 175% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.