Some people think it's better to choose friends who always have the same opinions as them. Other people believe it's good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Choosing or making friends could be a personal decision. People choose friends according to their mindset and vibes. It is frequently argued that people must have friends with similar thought process while others think that good friends can be someone who disagrees with our opinion. This essay agrees that finding somebody who can provide us wise viewpoints rather than supporting our concepts. This article will discuss both views.
It is certain that folks look for people who care their opinion even it is incorrect which might lead somebody to wrong direction. We must have networks who judge our statement and provides a logical opinion which may not match with us. But, when we crosscheck the same, we will understand the importance of getting such support from a genuine person. It is therefore agreed that friends could be someone who can correct your mistake and guide you in right way. For an example, during hard time, people tend to talk to somebody who can help us with assertive suggestions rather saying yes to all views.
In other hand, there are rigid people who love to have friends who will always support someone's ideas or mindset. This may give you positive feelings to have such friends. Eventually, distance between two people may increase due to misunderstanding of several unexpected outcomes. Hence, it is disagreed that having similar mindset friends may not be an intelligent choice. For instance, All of us sometimes go through lot of ups and downs in our life due our mistakes. Only good friends could help you to take right turn if you are open for it.
People may think to have friend with similar mentality but others feel to have friend who can help us with right choice. I believe, make friends who can share wise opinion only.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-19 | Assemkhidhr | 56 | view |
| 2024-02-18 | Assemkhidhr | 11 | view |
| 2024-02-18 | Assemkhidhr | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | SharmisthaNaskar | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-11 | ielts_tony | 84 | view |
- Some people think that real life skills like cooking housekeeping and gardening should be included in the curriculum as compulsory subjects Do you agree or disagree Explain your opinion using specific reasons and details 70
- Write about the following topic Every country has poor people and every country has different ways of dealing with the poor What are some of the reasons for world poverty How can the poor be helped Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant ex 61
- You have just spent a weekend at a friend’s house. When you returned home,you discovered you have left a coat containing some belongings in his house.Write a letter to your friend telling him that you left the coat. Tell him what the coatlo 56
- Nowadays in many countries women have full time jobs Therefore it is logical to share household tasks evenly between men and women To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 26, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'friended'.
Suggestion: friended
...en for it. People may think to have friend with similar mentality but others feel ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 80, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'friended'.
Suggestion: friended
...milar mentality but others feel to have friend who can help us with right choice. I be...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, look, may, so, therefore, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 7.30460921844 260% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91666666667 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40133990375 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563333333333 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1800642957 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.9444444444 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.38888888889 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.403899854203 0.244688304435 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134416482125 0.084324248473 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10232319407 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.289253192663 0.151304729494 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650032622937 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.