Some people think that large international sporting events only brings drawbacks, and that it is not worth hosting them.
Do you agree or disagree?
Hosting global sport contests have several disadvantages, so it should be discontinued organizing them, according to some people. In my opinion, I understand that it has few downsides, such as financial pressure but its positive impact can easily surpass its negative side.
To begin with, it is understandable that why few people are against global sport meets because of its few downsides. Organizing a huge event where participants are from all over the world puts huge burden on nation's economy because it demands enormous fund. For example, the Olympic hosted by China in 2014 that costed them around $3 billion, a waste of taxpayer's hard-earned money. Moreover, Contest at this level often invites more corruption because officials try to fill their own pocket under the name of competition. A scam, for example, of around $40 million uncovered, in 2008, during the Commonwealth sport meet in India. Thus, many people discourage such competitions.
However, it offers a great value compared to its negative impact. Firstly, its role in creating numerous employment opportunities, which is significant for any growing country, and setting up such contests require a huge workforce. For instance, a single event can provided work to as many as 40000 people. Secondly, it is a great platform to integrate diverse culture which is participating from different countries and to encourage individuals towards sports as well as healthy lifestyle which can have great impact on life in the long run. Additionally, governments have to invest less in health care if their citizens are healthy. Thus, nations should not stop organizing such event in the light of few minor downsides.
In conclusion, although few corrupt individual exploits this opportunity for their personal gains; its positive impact can easily outweigh its negative side. Thus, authorities should invest more to make its organization corruption free and affordable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-25 | niks23 | 73 | view |
| 2018-10-01 | drtruong92 | 78 | view |
| 2018-07-30 | bloomingme | 84 | view |
| 2018-07-17 | abhi1389 | 67 | view |
| 2018-07-17 | abhi1389 | 67 | view |
- People are less fit and active nowadays than in the past.What are the reasons for this?What do you think can be done for it? 95
- Nowadays people have free access to music and films online Is this a positive or a negative development Provide relevant examples from you own experience 92
- It is generally accepted that families are not as closed as they used to be. Give some reasons why this change has happened and suggest how families could be brought closer together. 89
- In recent society, more and more people are trying to live by their own. Is this a positive or a negative trend? What is your opinion and share your personal experiences? 73
- Nowadays people have free access to music and films online. Is this a positive or a negative development?Provide relevant examples from you own experience. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
... all over the world puts huge burden on nations economy because it demands enormous fun...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 331, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...by China in 2014 that costed them around billion, a waste of taxpayers hard-earne...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1634.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41059602649 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94455585659 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622516556291 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2234648546 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.125 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5625 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0855231732593 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0307647973928 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368708835575 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0550090479136 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389879693923 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.