some people think that large international sporting events only brings drawbacks, and that it is not worth hosting them.Do you agree or disagree?

Some argue that international sporting events are not worth organizing due to many major setbacks. I disagree with this statement because these large events bring huge benefits to countries and people around the world.

It is understandable why people are against such events considering the downsides. One reason is that these large-scaled sporting competitions are the chance for supporters to gather around at one place cheering their favorite team, which is the underlying cause of many serious crimes, especially terrorism. For example, in 2002, over 1000 football fans from Portugues were severely injured by a bomb attack in Bernabeu stadium in Spain during a match of European football league. Another reason is that a majority of people only consider sports a type of entertainment while it takes a substantial amount of national revenues to organize. Therefore, saying that these events are not worth hosting seems reasonable.

However, I believe that host countries would gain an enormous profit from these international events. One reason to support my standpoint on this matter is the lucrative amount of money extracting from sports supporters. Along with the profit from selling seat tickets, host countries will also be benefited by the money from other activities such as accommodation and sight-seeing. With such a sizable number of visitors, the amount of money will be multiplied enormously to enrich national budgets as well as cover all event expenses such as security, infrastructure and transportation. In other words, this is a legit international business which is undoubtedly worth investing in.

In conclusion, I believe that money alone is the reason why governments should hold the international sporting events more frequently despite several detriments. After all, money is the key to boosting a nation’s economy.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, therefore, well, while, after all, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5034965035 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05833546475 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601398601399 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9180848651 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.428571429 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226481249294 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0819014958221 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066108684628 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152120988389 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0915765042336 0.056905535591 161% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.