some people think that modern technology is making people more sociable, while others think it is making them less sociable. Discuss both views and give own opinion.
It has been argued whether that, recent technology evolution has helped to improve public sociality, or they became less sociable. I believe that technology has decreased sociality between community members. This essay will discuss both points of view.
on the one hand, technology has been increased by an unprecedented rate; the daily use of technical devices and the massive spread of Mobile phones and laptops have turned the world into a small village. Moreover, people can keep in touch anytime even if they are in different continents; they can boost their sociable abilities. Besides, due to the busy life, technology helps community members to look after their families and friends without the need of travilling. A study has been published by the New York Times newspaper reported that 80 % of community members spend 40% of their daily time on mobile applications which helped them to communicate with others.
On the other hand, the negative outcome is that technology is slowly killing real activism and replacing it with slacktivism; Moreover, it creates a great gap between family members. Besides, modern technology has encouraged the public to use computers and mobile phones to express their concerns on social issues without actually having to engage actively with others in real life, which is against societal norms. For instance, research from a societal magazine in 2019 showed that the gab among family members was increasing by 30% from 2017 to 2018. As almost a quarter the world’s population is now on Facebook.
In conclusion, the power of technology has shifted the balance from the hands of a few to the masses; therefore, Its drawbacks effect on our social behaviour. It is recommended that we should be aware of the demerits of the technology as well as its merits to raise our community standards.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-04 | ahmed ahmed | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-04 | ahmed ahmed | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | feroz121 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | feroz121 | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-10 | daly.shaker.99@gmail.com | 84 | view |
- In Some countries fast food restaurants and companies give money to schools provided that the schools promote their products to school children What do you think is the positive and negative of this in the development of children 61
- You saw an advert asking for volunteers to run a charity event 1 Explain why you are interested in helping 2 give details suitable past experience 3 suggest ways you might help with the event 56
- Some people prefer young leaders while others think senior managers have the experience What do you think 87
- City council is planning to pull down one of the historical buildings in your town because they do not have funds to renovate it Write a letter to the city council and in your letter mention the below What is the importance of the building Why should it b 11
- Some people prefer young leaders, while others thinks senior managers have the experience. What do you think? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...ay will discuss both points of view. on the one hand, technology has been incre...
^^
Line 3, column 668, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...helped them to communicate with others. On the other hand, the negative outcome ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 292, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erits to raise our community standards.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16722408027 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73091559738 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605351170569 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2266561328 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.846153846 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114232693879 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0398614071163 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351357680057 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0719430276944 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488094177647 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.