A few individuals opine that money is the efficient present for youngsters. However, other people disagree. Therefore, before attending my view both opinions will be analyzed in the further paragraphs.
To begin with, there are lots of reasons to give money to teenagers as a gift. Money is intensely essential for the growth of individuals. First and foremost, it is very necessary to have sufficient money for teenagers. Because they want to rise more in their whatever field, but they can not do due to issues of money. To exemplify, if an unwealthy student have got an excellent outcome in their particular field and if individuals wish to get some gifts, they should give some amounts of money to encourage their further study.
On the other hand, there are several negative sides behind of this. Some children have got rich parents from God as a present. Firstly, they can not focus vividly on their study because they believe that their parents will do anything for them. Secondly, they always rely on their parents. That reasons that do not try to express their own ideas in study, job and many more. In addition to it, they always spend more money for their hobbies and they buy huge amount of products which can be immensely impacted on deprived people because they can not purchase it.
To conclude, if anyone who needs money, people should give them as a gift. According to my point of view, it depends on humans how they utilize their presented money.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, in addition, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1221.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82608695652 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43784777033 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581027667984 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.5931395607 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.3125 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8125 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243963853659 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924932918677 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675566598378 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176871750299 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688539322334 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.0946893788 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.