Some people think the only purpose to work hard is to earn money.
To what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Some people believe the only purpose to work hard is to earn money. While this may be true there are others who believe people work hard for a plethora of reasons like personal satisfaction, relevant experience and earning reputation. In my opinion, people nowadays work hard to not only to earn monetary benefits but also to earn a reputation and gain valuable experience. In the below paragraphs I will elucidate with relevant examples and conclude accordingly.
Firstly, in this era of globalization money plays a pivotal role in enabling people to enjoy modern amenities. Although people in modern society need to dress, eat, shop and dwell themselves however no aspect of it is possible without money. Hence people relate money to hard work. In Japan, there are many sectors which employ people on hourly wages, the simple concept the money is directly proportional to the number of hours spent in work justifies the fact the people who work hard will get more money. Additionally, wages are a motivating factor which governs how much effort a person will spend in delivering quality work although it is not the only factor.
Secondly, there are others who work hard for achieving personal satisfaction, reputation or serving society. Voluntary work is a perfect example which demonstrates how people spend their time on helping the needful without any materialistic ambitions. For instance, young doctors from developed nations travel to poor countries in Africa on voluntary missions to serve in hospitals and clinics. Despite the lack of monetary benefits in developing countries, doctors from first world countries earn personal satisfaction, reputation and valuable experience by helping destitute people.
To conclude, it is evident from the above examples that money is not the only persuading factor for people to work hard however there are other factors which people pursue like earning personal satisfaction and gaining valuable experience.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-22 | marasheed1763@gmail.com | 61 | view |
- You have recently moved to a different house.Write a letter to an English-speaking friend. In your letter•Explain why you have moved•Describe the new house•Invite your friend to come and visit 78
- You have recently attended a job interview which went well but you are still waiting for the decision Write a letter to HR manager of the company and say Give details of the job Why do you think the interview went well Why do you need to know the result 80
- You feel the evening programs on a local television station are uninteresting.Write a letter to the manager of the television station. In your letter:Explain why you do not like the current programsDescribe what kind of programs you would like to see inst 81
- After working in your department for over 3 years, you feel the need to switch your department.Write a letter to your boss requesting a change in the department. In the letter mention:• Why do you want to switch departments? • Which department would y 78
- Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged.Others believe that children who are taught to co-operate rather than competebecome more useful adults.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...aspect of it is possible without money. Hence people relate money to hard work. In Ja...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34838709677 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76935812651 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532258064516 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7835799235 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.428571429 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07142857143 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308897133265 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132251400592 0.084324248473 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118075478807 0.0667982634062 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204080929367 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104643762221 0.056905535591 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.