Some people think that in order to solve traffic and transportation problems people should be encouraged to live in cities rather than in suburbs or in the countryside.
To what extent do you agree or disagree ?
It is universally acknowledged that; traffic and transport is one of the most contentious issues the world over. Many advocate that the sole solution to this concern is migration of people from towns and villages toward the cities. This essay will deeply analyze why, the idea of motivating individuals is completely preposterous, as it results is over-crowding of cities.
Firstly, the proponent of this believe argue that fewer vehicles will run between rural and urban areas. Most population of the villages and suburbs move to cities daily to reach their work-place and educational institutes, which is the major cause of transport consumption and congestion of traffic in cities. A succinate example proclaiming this, In UK, statistics shows that 66% of population moving on road every-day in metropolitan cities comes from side areas, which is a matter of concern for local public. If people from country-side are attracted to reside in rural areas permanently is will extirpate the transport and traffic jam issues.
One the other side, argument of populating cities, in order to cull road and transport issues, is completely absurd. Rise in population will consequently leads to consumption of huge amount of resources, i.e. scarcity of health facilities, educational institutes and daily commodities. For instance, in 2015, USA government reported that people face difficulty in getting appointment with their general physicians because of the excessive influx of patient that came from rural areas. Overall, due to over-population in cities people will face more problem in getting basic necessities of life as compared to resolving road concerns.
To conclude, this essay argued that; encouraging people to live in cities, reduce transport burden but they over-look other problems it might bring. I completely disagree with inviting people to stay permanently in metropolis just for solving single problem, ended up pilling other
- countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy same product anywhere in the world.Do you think this is a positive or negative development. 61
- Both poor and the rich find the accessibility into university difficult.Do you agree or disagree? 11
- The system used for rubbish/garbage collection in your local area is not working properly.This is causing problems for you and your neighbours.Write a letter to the local council. In your letter1.Describe how the rubbish collection system is not working p 89
- Some people think that in order to solve traffic and transportation problems people should be encouraged to live in cities rather than in suburbs or in the countryside.To what extent do you agree or disagree ? 78
- Some people think that it is better to educate boys and girls in separate schools. Others, However, believe that boys and girls benefit more from attending mixed schools.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 114, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun advocate seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many advocates'.
Suggestion: Many advocates
...most contentious issues the world over. Many advocate that the sole solution to this concern ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belief' (noun) instead of believe (verb)?
Suggestion: belief
...ties. Firstly, the proponent of this believe argue that fewer vehicles will run betw...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 438, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cities'' or 'city's'?
Suggestion: cities'; city's
...oving on road every-day in metropolitan cities comes from side areas, which is a matte...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 155, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
...d. Rise in population will consequently leads to consumption of huge amount of resour...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 569, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...eople will face more problem in getting basic necessities of life as compared to resolving road c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, if, look, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50666666667 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97574640497 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6691174143 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.076923077 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.69230769231 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175828704919 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643630406629 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501817176251 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113481188355 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511639528063 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.