As computers translate quickly and accurately, learning foreign languages is a waste of time?
To what extend do you agree or disagree.
There is a robust argument that computers can efficiently and precisely do language conversions; thus, mastering overseas language is no longer required with this advancement. I completely disagree with the notion. This essay will deeply analyze the argument and render the best verdict out of it.
Firstly, overseas languages broaden a person’s horizon because language represents the culture of a country. Traveling has remarkably increased these days and daily people are encountered with wide range of languages. Hence, language barrier refrains a person from indulging into a specific culture. A succinate example proclaiming this; In Germany, people around tend to feel home sick due to constraint put up by language of a country resulting in boredom rather than enjoyment. However, without the knowledge of a local language one cannot expand his social circle and here, role of computer for language culled in the real world.
Secondly, knowledge of foreign languages is imperative in multiple businesses. These-days trade has no boundaries as expanding the world over, hence to compete with the international business, being multilingual is of utmost importance for an effective customer and company relationship. For illustration, in Pakistan, thousands of foreigners pay visit to tourist places every year, which requires spontaneous verbal skills and it completely extirpates the efficiency of computers. In other words, for communication in business, there is no room for translation and individuals must have proficiency in language in order to guide and explain properly.
On the other hand, in the world outside the offices where computers are not readily available for translating language within blink of eye, bring more problem for those individuals who are not familiar with the foreign language.
To conclude, this essay argued why considering foreign linguistics is a waste of time is preposterous. I completely disagree with the statement, in actual it is investment of time because it results in gaining enormous experience and it flourishes business.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-22 | daly.shaker.99@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-23 | Aroraprerna | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-18 | khan0229 | 89 | view |
- Some people believe that children should be given lessons on how to manage money in school.Do you agree or disagree? 56
- Young people are often influenced by their peers Do the advantages of peer pressure outweigh the disadvantages 60
- As computers translate quickly and accurately, learning foreign languages is a waste of time?To what extend do you agree or disagree. 89
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after 5 years 47
- You have recently started work in a new company.Write a letter to an English-speaking friend. In your letter● explain why you changed jobs● describe your new job● tell him/her your other news. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 640, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... for language culled in the real world. Secondly, knowledge of foreign languages...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...here computers are not readily available for translating language within blink of...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1778.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62658227848 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08706383914 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639240506329 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8848979049 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.533333333 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0666666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173876774818 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056988436811 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047463111011 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0970330543444 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0138425754341 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.