some people think that plastic shopping bags should be prohibited because they are one of the major pollutants of both land and water around the world. I completely agree, but I think there are other measures that can be taken before putting a complete ban in place.
Plastic bags are the most dangerous pollutant in this world. When these plastic bags are discarded from our homes are dumped in to landfill sites and oceans create catastrophic disaster for every living being on earth. Even though the government bans the plastic bag production but still they are being circulated illegally. In the following essay, I will illustrate other measures which will reduce the usage of plastic bags.
Firstly, people's behaviour of using the plastic bags should be changed, by organizing meeting at public places in order to create awareness about the irreversible damage when they are dumped into land fill sites. Additionally, cash backs should be provided at shops for customer who bring their cotton bags, this will encourage more people deter plastic bags. For instance, one nearby retail outlet, introduced 1 percent cash back to all their customer who bring cotton bags, within 3 months around 90 percent of their customers adopted to use cloth bags for shopping.
Secondly, some illegal plastic bag manufacturers sell their products to all shops very secretly. The government should punish companies who produce plastic bags beyond allowable microns prescribed by the safety authority. For example, the recent raid conducted at the very famous hotel chain found that, the plastic boxes could potential threat for people who consume and store foods.
Finally, the government should introduce new mechanism to recycle the discarded plastic bags into other reusable products which are less harm full for the atmosphere. Countries like Sweden has already generated electricity from the plastic waste. Such measure is being considered as highly recommended to reduce the space it occupies in the land fill sites and suffice the needs of electricity for people.
In conclusion, it is our responsibility to preserve our planet for our future generation. The discarded plastics bags are not bio-degradable would have cascading impact to all living beings. Thus, it has been considered that consumer's behaviour and government's method of recycling are vital measures which bring down impacts to a great extent.
- Countries around the world will be facing significant challenges relating not only to the environment, but population and education as well.What problems will your country face in the next ten years?How can these problems be overcome? 67
- Some people use technology to take advice for their medical problems rather than seeing a doctor. Why this is so? It is positive or negative development according to you? 84
- Some people think that men are naturally more competitive than women.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- More and more people wear fashionable clothes Is this positive or negative development 89
- Music should be taught in school along with other subjects like computer and science Do you agree or disagree with this statement 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 291, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommended reducing'.
Suggestion: recommended reducing
...h measure is being considered as highly recommended to reduce the space it occupies in the land fill ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 226, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'consumers'' or 'consumer's'?
Suggestion: consumers'; consumer's
...ings. Thus, it has been considered that consumers behaviour and governments method of rec...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, still, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1814.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41492537313 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6357448308 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602985074627 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3333283253 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.375 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9375 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211122395 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764552904634 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443896317553 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119193496319 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050408948378 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.