Some people think that public health within a country can be improved by government making laws regarding nutritious food. Others, however, think that health is a matter of personal choice and responsibility.
discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is obvious that healthy food helps us to increase public health, and because of that we can have healthy society. Some people believe that it is an authority duty and they should keep their attention on people’s diet, while others think differently. In their opinion every person need to eat which food that they want. This essay will shed some light on this argument from both sides and extend my partial support to the former view before arriving at conclusion.
With rapid growth of population, the number of food producer company is growing too. We witness a lot of new foods product that they are newly established. Controlling on their outcome is very crucial and it is an obligation of government leaders should have well supervised on healthy foods and even organic fruit and vegetable. By this way consumers use nourishing foods and they get health, so all society will be healthy. Moreover, administers may constitute rules for food producers that use the best foodstuff for their product. If food products quality will increase consequently the foods which people eat them are full of nourishment and the rate of public health can be rise. Furthermore, ministers should put big budget on advertising of healthy foods. They can show the difference between nutritious and less energy foods and compare them with each others from social media, TV or the Radio. By this work healthful living in countries will be increase.
On the other hand, some citizenry believes that eating meals goes back to every person taste, and they choose that each food is good for them, thus this is a personal subject and government cannot interfere on them. Since children include the big part of society, so it is their parent’s responsibility that teach them to eat nutritious foods. They can help to improve public health with not eating junk foods, and parents should remind their children that fast foods are unhealthy and with eating them they get sick.
At the conclusion, in my opinion our leaders play a key role on this argument, because they have two big facilities. The first is money and second is power. So they can learn them to eat healthy foods and even restrict them from unwholesome foods.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-15 | Be unique | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-02 | deeksha kapil | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-19 | Amir Nazaripoor | 78 | view |
| 2019-02-18 | javaduddupudi | 61 | view |
| 2019-02-18 | javaduddupudi | 73 | view |
- A large company in your area has decided to spend a certain amount of money either to sponsor a local children s sports team for two years or to pay for two open air concerts It has asked for feedback from the general public Write a letter to the company 91
- Last Tuesday you flew from New York to Paris When you arrived home you discovered that you had left your cabin bag on the plane Write a letter to the airline Where and when you lost your bag What your bag looks like What it is contents were 87
- Economic growth is the only way to end world poverty. However, some people says it leads to environment damage and should be stopped.To what extend do you agree? 87
- People sleep less than before in many countries. Why do people sleep less? What effect does it have on an individually and society? 67
- News stories on TV and in newspaper are very often accompanied by pictures Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words What is your opinion about this 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'foods'' or 'food's'?
Suggestion: foods'; food's
...is growing too. We witness a lot of new foods product that they are newly established...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, so, thus, well, while, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 24.0651302605 208% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1848.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 374.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94117647059 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5429648994 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542780748663 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0090647928 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2631578947 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6842105263 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.10526315789 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206698372403 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066899637466 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495395148988 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130014051488 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581962014796 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.