Some people think that to reduce traffic and pollution, the government should increase tax on petrol (diesel). Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, the majority of metropolis cities are confronting a number of problems, such as traffic jams and air pollution. However, some individuals believe that imposing tax on fuel will be mitigated such problems. This write up, will discuss how hiked fuel rate would not beneficial for society rather than it has some benefits.
To begin with, there are plethoras of various benefits of imposing tax on fossil fuel. Firstly, if the fuel available at high rate then people will reduce the use of own vehicles. As the main cause of burgeoning traffic is a vast variety of vehicles manufacturing. Additionally, these automobiles are available with variant and facilities, such as cost-efficiency, reliable and mileage sufficiency. This availability encourages people to purchase such vehicles. Secondly, the high rate of fuel will not affordable by everyone and that will mitigate the vast consumption of fuels, therefore, people will use public transport rather than their own vehicles.
On the other hand, the main two problems are being confronting by individuals, due to highly rate of fuel. Firstly, imposing tax on fossil fuel will only deter the middle-group families. The affluent people can afford the highly priced oil. Secondly, if the petrol and diesel will available on high rates then obviously, the inflation rate will be also increased. Thus, it is very hard for poor people to survive. For instance, due to high price of oils and highly inflation rates, the developing countries facing difficulties for their citizens.
To Sum up, the traffic congestion and pollution are the main problems in big cities. Although, there are lot of solutions, imposing tax on fuel is one of them. But this only approach will not decrease the traffic and pollution related problems. Some other measurements such as, rule and regulations for industrial wastage, car polling, better public transport, should also be taken to solve the problems. Lastly, increasing tax on fuel have demerits than merits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-10 | gspreet1010@gmail.com | 53 | view |
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal of more money than people in other profession. Some people think that this is fully justified while others think that it is unfair.Discuss both views and give opinion. 73
- Nowadays culture is more or less the same around the world as compare in the past Is this a positive or negative trend 78
- Some people think that modern technology is making people more sociable, while others think it is making them less sociable, discuss both views and give opinion. 89
- In some countries children have very strict rules of behaviour, while in other countries they are allowed to do almost anything they want.To what you extent should children have to follow the rules.Give reasons of yours answers and include any relevant ex 73
- Ordinary people try to copy famous personalities by seeing them on TV and reading them on newspaper What is the reason Is it good idea to copy famous personalities 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 180, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...le will reduce the use of own vehicles. As the main cause of burgeoning traffic is...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, for instance, such as, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1685.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28213166144 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87073747261 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53605015674 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8351782471 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.25 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.95 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.95 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137204964258 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462112373778 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0258118439001 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0901028233359 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237339103411 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.