Some people think that school children should learn practical skills such as car maintenance or bank account management along with academic subjects at school.
Do you agree or disagree?
Young learners always find an activity base learning more interesting. Some believe that younger school students should gain hands-on experience alongside with regular subjects.It is one great way of studying at school with more realism. So I fully agree with the statement and I will discuss this in this essay.
Firstly, pragmatic skill learning will aid child students to grasp the theoretical concept more naturally and accurately, therefore this will come in handy in the future job market, because employers are very eager to hire people who richly in a hands-on experience when they come out of educational institutions. For example, It may be more practical to teach them to get real look-and-feel on a common vehicle and its’ components and maybe how to take care while teaching the science lessons about vehicles in the school. This might help to offer more talented individuals to a country’s workforce.
Furthermore, this method of teaching will be essential for sharpening the abilities, which helps to develop Childs’ proper planning abilities, such as financial planning and management. If the student were given a lesson on the importance of financial management, it is better to participate them real-life banking activities. Such as, opening a bank account and how to manage their bank account properly, it will raise the interest and might give them a proper knowledge of how to manage their finances. Regarding proper planning, attending to actual skills will play a vital role in future planning.
To conclude, real hand-on skills will be essential considering when competing for better professions and when comes to the proper management skills or even other fields of areas.Undoubtedly I completely agree with the statement.
- Some people think that school children should learn practical skills such as car maintenance or bank account management along with academic subjects at school Do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 73
- The internet is a great source of information and has opened up opportunities for people to learn all over the world is all information reliable on the internet what could be done to control information online 78
- You have eaten at a restaurant and it was such a terrible experience that you have decided to inform the manager by letter of what happened and that you want your money back 1 Describe the problem 2 Explain why you are unhappy 3 Say what you would like to 73
- Some people think that the best way to stay fit is by joining a gym while others think doing everyday activities such as walking and climbing stairs is sufficient Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 175, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...erience alongside with regular subjects.It is one great way of studying at school ...
^^
Line 3, column 231, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a rich'.
Suggestion: who is a rich
...employers are very eager to hire people who rich in a hands-on experience when they come...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 416, Rule ID: YOURS_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: An apostrophe is never used to form possessive case pronouns. Did you mean: 'its'?
Suggestion: its
...l look-and-feel on a common vehicle and its’ components and maybe how to take care ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 420, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ok-and-feel on a common vehicle and its’ components and maybe how to take care wh...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, may, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, while, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32894736842 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88416130384 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618421052632 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.1011423887 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.714285714 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187183671524 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059515956431 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523696310376 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10624176806 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457636953855 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.