Some people say that technologies such as mobile phones is disrupting social interaction. Do you agree or disagree?
It is a fact that technology is vital to living in the cyber era. Therefore many people argue that modern technologies and devices like cellular phones are building barriers between social activities. Even though the techs make lives more convenient, I fully agree with the above statement, and I will discuss it in this essay.
Since the last three decayed we have been fast phasing trough the digitalisation, among them telecommunication technology plays a vital role.Such as the internet and advanced mobile devices, which aid two or more persons to connect from different places. However, in the past, people used to meet face-to-face for discussions and to do various activities which are more healthy and joyful. That has given them a great opportunity to develop a real understanding between each other and how they really felt. For example, according to researchers, people spent less than a minute talking to their close relatives' trough the phone, because of this, unfortunately, society may infest with robot-like people.
Furthermore, the children and the younger generation have become victims of such devices. Present-day they tend to spend a significant amount of time on their mobile devices, therefore many reluctant to go out and socialize. Social interaction is a paramount factor for healthy physical and brain development, whereas, this causes to lower the development of these vital elements. Therefore, there is a surpassing chance of making socially dormant younger people in society.
To conclude, it is obvious that mobile devices are the one major cause to lose social connectivity in modern society due to lack of up-close and personal feeling and developing socially active children. Therefore I will fully agree with the statement.
- Some people think that the best way to stay fit is by joining a gym while others think doing everyday activities such as walking and climbing stairs is sufficient Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- You have eaten at a restaurant and it was such a terrible experience that you have decided to inform the manager by letter of what happened and that you want your money back 1 Describe the problem 2 Explain why you are unhappy 3 Say what you would like to 73
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 73
- The internet is a great source of information and has opened up opportunities for people to learn all over the world is all information reliable on the internet what could be done to control information online 78
- Some people say that technologies such as mobile phones is disrupting social interaction Do you agree or disagree 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 67, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...gy is vital to living in the cyber era. Therefore many people argue that modern technolog...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 333, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lowering', 'lowing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: lowering; lowing
... brain development whereas, this causes to lower the development of these vital elements...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 204, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...nd developing socially active children. Therefore I will fully agree with the statement.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, really, so, therefore, whereas, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35430463576 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93365710675 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619205298013 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2163195711 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.8 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1333333333 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.93333333333 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220882076408 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659273544263 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036428886035 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130255636566 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0158601717035 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.