Some people think that women can play an equal role to men in country's police force and army. While others think this kind of work is not suitable for women. Discuss both view and give your opinion.
Many recent wars and insurgencies have provided example that combat unit containing men and women have performed well in battle, though the dispute about whether women should be allowed to join country's police or army has never stopped. In this essay, I am going to examine both sides and provide my opinion.
Women should, without a doubt, be allowed to join police force and army, regardless of gender difference, especially if women meet the physical standards. The common belief that women were naturally softer and gentler by nature, in fact a culturally defined assumption by no means common to all human societies over time. Moreover, most position in today's military and police require little physical conditioning and a lot of intellectual training and discipline. To deny women the right to fight for their fellow citizens is to deny them their rights as citizen and should be stopped.
On The other hand, there are people who think that women should not participate in country's defensive force. First of all, by placing women alongside with men in force could seriously harm both the morale and the on- the-ground capabilities of the military. Secondly, women lose too much training and duty time from pregnancy and other problems. As military policy allows pregnant women to resign immediately, it opens up the possibility that vital members of the unit could suddenly disappear at a time. The bottom line is that integrating females into direct combat occupations will weaken the effectiveness of combat unit.
To sum up, though there are some drawbacks about women joining the police or army, I think there should not be any legal objections for women to decide what profession they want to choose.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-03-03 | Pooja.sharma61 | 89 | view |
- People sleeps less than they used to in past what do you think is the reason behind this what are the effects on individual 84
- some people say that the more a product is advertised more people but it To what extend do you agree 11
- Some people say that the more a product is advertised more people buy it To what extend do you agree 73
- Some people spend a lot of money on tickets to go to sporting or cultural events. Is this good or bad thing. 78
- some people say that the more a product is advertised more people but it To what extend do you agree 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, i think, in fact, first of all, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09219858156 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60717168556 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627659574468 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9233813517 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.666666667 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.08333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271903457361 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0969174195252 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685910647187 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166789769798 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305107850614 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.