Some people trust their first impressions about a person’s character because they believe these judgments are generally correct. Other people do not judge a person’s character quickly because they believe first impressions are often wrong.
Compare these two attitudes. Which attitude do you agree with?
It is thought by some people that first impressions about people are correct and they can understand a general kind of person from the one sight. However, there is another group of people, which think that we need some time to understand person’s character and don’t need to be hurry about conclusions. I totally agree that first impression is wrong in most cases and nobody can be judged from the first sight.
Nowadays, a lot of people tend to emphasize their presence I society by wearing a variety of clothing’s types. Somebody prefer to wear expansive suits to highlight a strict character, somebody loves to put on themselves colorful trousers and t-shirts. It could be explained by the fact that every single person has her own flavors and preferences. However, these preferences have nothing in common with person’s mental, communicative and physical abilities. Even although contemporary psychologists claim that people’s type of clothing is the most important feature that shows their character, you need to be a professional too evaluate a person by it.
To give a clear example, members of a famous British rock band, which called “Black Sabbath”, were seeking for their first recording company in 1969. More than 10 different companies’ managers refused their offer, saying that all members of the band had “inappropriate” style. Nevertheless, few months later they finally found the label which accepted their offer and the first album appeared on the top of the radio rating in 1970. As a result, we can see that unusual style can reflect very smart and innovative person.
One more thing, we need to remember that there is also minority of people who doesn’t pay attention to clothing, jewelry and costly items. It could be caused by variety of factors. For instance, lots of Ukrainian people try to spare some money due economical unrest and instability in country. They think that buying high quality food or study in prestige educational facility is much more important than useless ‘pieces of rag’.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that we shouldn’t make wrong conclusions by judging people from the first sight. To understand someone, we need to pay attention for his actions, own values and contributes into society.
- In many countries, the amount of crime is increasing.What do you think are the main causes of crime?How can we deal with those causes? 84
- You find that your study load is too heavy. Write a letter to your college teacher explaining why you need to withdraw from two courses. Ask if it is possible to obtain a refund. 80
- Nowadays it is possible to use computers and mobile phones for automatic language translation, and there is no need for human translators and interpreters. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
- Your neighbors have recently written to you to complain about the noise from your house flat.Write a letter to your neighbors.In your letter explain the reasons for the noise apologize.Describe what action you will take. 84
- You have recently moved to a different house. Write a letter to an English-speaking friend.Explain why you have movedDescribe a new houseInvite your friend to come and visit 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 125, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'Somebody' must be used with a third-person verb: 'prefers'.
Suggestion: prefers
...iety of clothing's types. Somebody prefer to wear expansive suits to highlight a ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 639, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to evaluate'?
Suggestion: to evaluate
...haracter, you need to be a professional too evaluate a person by it. To give a clear exampl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, so, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2003.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 379.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28496042216 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12606008502 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604221635884 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 610.2 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6124982087 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.15 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.95 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377325015631 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0993481296159 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854722283676 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171970221922 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0998614160388 0.056905535591 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.