Some people trust their first impressions about a person’s character because they believe these judgments are generally correct. Other people do not judge a person’s character quickly because they believe first impressions are often wrong.Compare thes

Essay topics:

Some people trust their first impressions about a person’s character because they believe these judgments are generally correct. Other people do not judge a person’s character quickly because they believe first impressions are often wrong.
Compare these two attitudes. Which attitude do you agree with?

The quote; ‘We get only one chance to make first impression’ is a famous one that shows the importance of building a reputable image of ourselves in the first meet. However, since long time, whether this intuition should be trusted or not, has been a contentious subject. This essay will discuss both the views before coming to a reasoned conclusion.

Since the dawn of early men, human brain has evolved gradually to be cautious about danger as this was crucial for their security. For instance, imagine a group of prehistoric men accidentally coming across another such bunch. Within moments they have to decide if there is any impending peril that can be caused by the strangers. Similarly, even after million years, we use the same instinct to judge people around us. Citing this, a segment of our society believes that this innate characteristic of human beings should be trusted in weighing an unfamiliar individual.

Contrarily, we also have to acknowledge that a person’s code of conduct at any time depends on various factors such as; their level of nervousness at that moment, their nature to react to novel situations and so on. Moreover, every person is multifaceted and we may be exposed to only one of their multiple angles. Furthermore, attempting to evaluate such a complicated human personality in initial meeting itself may turn into a dreadful blunder and also, we have to keep in mind that people tend to have their guard up always and it will take a while for them to expose their true self and take someone as their confidant.

Concisely, it is the nature of anyone to access unknown people. But, we should never jump to conclusions and make snap judgement based on how someone made us feel when we met them for the first time.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2016-12-19 Janani P 78 view
2016-10-25 max1991 73 view
2016-10-24 max1991 31 view
2016-10-24 max1991 87 view
Essays by user Janani P :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 354, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...by the strangers. Similarly, even after million years, we use the same instinct to judg...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 546, Rule ID: VB_A_WHILE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'take awhile'?
Suggestion: take awhile
... have their guard up always and it will take a while for them to expose their true self and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, similarly, so, while, for instance, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalization wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93355481728 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73501237877 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641196013289 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.8935404924 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.230769231 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1538461538 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160684618133 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0472974531348 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423152676114 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0838703302201 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365466250657 0.056905535591 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.