Some people who go to work abroad for a period of time take their family with them. Does it have more advantages than disadvantages for individual and their family?
It is quite a common practice for many people to work abroad to find better opportunities as it is convenient these days due to globalization. Many employees prefer to keep their families with them during the time of employment. Certainly, it has more advantages as compared to disadvantages.
First and foremost, they can take care of their family more reasonably. Their children need surveillance and a good upbringing guide which is only possible when both parents are living with them. Subsequently, these people can transfer moral and ethical values to their children. Secondly, individuals can also feel peace and happiness. People who are working abroad will be happy and would not feel homesickness if they will be living with their wife and children as they are a special part of everyone’s life and nobody wants to miss them. As a result, employees’ performance would be excellent at their work due to peace of mind and contentment. On a further note, foreign employment in developed countries can provide opportunities for a better lifestyle for their families. They can have quality education, food, living, and a chance to live in sophisticated societies like Finland, Norway, and Ireland.
Conversely, the cost of living is quite high in many developed countries. House rents, children's education especially in colleges and universities, and medical facilities are quite over the budget in such countries for an individual. Therefore, people can provide quality living to their families but they would not be able to make enough savings. Furthermore, people who are living abroad for decades are more likely to forget their culture and cultural values. Now they are part of new culture and society and they start to adopt new social norms which make them away from their own culture. Consequently, they feel less passionate about their roots. Indians who, for instance, are living abroad for many years are less likely to celebrate their cultural and religious events.
The conclusion to be drawn is that many employees working abroad prefer to keep their families with them but there are few pros and cons. They can monitor their children as well as have feelings of contentment. They can also, provide a better lifestyle to them; however, it may be too costly to take them abroad and they can also forget their culture while living in a new culture and society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-19 | Kamran2555 | 68 | view |
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering computing and medicine Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people rich countries are stealing from poor c 11
- Some people believe that every human can create art Other people think that art can only be created by people with special talents Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering computing and medicine Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people rich countries are stealing from poor c 78
- Some people feel that the cost of space exploration is far too high for the benefits it brings while others argue that we space programs should continue no matter what the cost Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, conversely, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2002.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 391.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12020460358 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78845575693 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498721227621 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 621.9 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9441787369 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3333333333 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.619047619 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52380952381 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360773811498 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120019123542 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705100445144 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257536647562 0.151304729494 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030915074557 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.