Some schools have restricted the use of mobile phones Is this a positive development or a negative one

Nowadays smart phones are extremely popular among teenagers. Although there are many benefits of using mobile phones such as learning new things and playing games, schools are restricting their usage due to drawbacks like constant chatting and cyber bullying. In my opinion, the restriction is essential for students as an excess of everything is harmful.

Some parents believe that children should be allowed to carry smart phones because it is the need of an hour. They argue that technology is extremely important for their child and they can learn a lot better by using such devices. Moreover, children are constantly engaged in games on their phones while their parents or teachers are away. For example, a study showed that teenagers spend more time playing video games than sports. Therefore, we can see that there a few advantages to using smart devices among children.

Conversely, if the usage of gadgets is not limited, they may cause a plethora of problems including reduced focus, cyber bullying and lack of activities. The main problem is a distraction during the classroom, for instance, pupils are found chatting during the lectures and not paying attention in the class. Secondly, there is a new crime that is quite popular among young people, that is called cyber bullying which happens on the social media platform. As a result of cyber bullying many students try to escape school and go into the first stage of depression. Thirdly, juniors are found less interactive and active during sports class as they are glued to their handsets. Consequently, to avoid such issues educational institutes have started prohibiting the usage of electronic gadgets inside the campus.

In conclusion, though children will complain about the limitation of using digital devices, institutions would benefit by creating a positive learning environment for all. Overall, I agree, this will lead to a positive development for society in the future and a better learning space for adolescents, that is, with increased focus, reduced online bullying, and more active youth.

Votes
Average: 9.2 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 190, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g environment for all. Overall, I agree, this will lead to a positive development...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, conversely, first, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1748.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26506024096 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67552630204 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593373493976 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6826768723 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.25 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5625 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145959460788 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0428355041457 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0313333430375 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.091302452512 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375225630039 0.056905535591 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.