Some scientists believe that in the future computers will be more intelligence than human beings While some see this as a positive development other worry about the consequences Discuss both views and give your opinions

People have different views about the impact of artificial intelligence on our lives. While some argue that the advance of computer technology becomes a threat to human survival. I believe that its benefits outweigh the drawbacks.
On the one hand, there are various reasons why people believe that computers are detrimental to our lives. They assert that technology will make human laborers redundant. This is mainly because computers undertake most tasks at a rate faster than humans, many companies have begun to utilize robots to replace human workers in the production process. This can result in the unemployment rate in industries. Moreover, it is inevitable that an error in the programming system can have a devastating effect on the security of the country. To illustrate, countries can become vulnerable to external threats, if sensitive information is leaked online through hacking.
On the other hand, I believe that intelligent computers might be beneficial to humans. Firstly, intelligent computers help reduce mistakes because they are programmed with algorithms to accomplish particular tasks meticulously. It would promote the quality of products for companies. Scondly, automobile technology would help curb traffic congestion as well as improve road safety. For example, driveless cars enable to alcohol drinkers go home safely which contributes to minimizing traffic accidents.
In conclusion, there are both positives and negatives to developing computers that are as smart as humans. However, I prefer that the development of artificial intelligence is the greatest invention in terms of quality standards and convenience. Given this situation, it is recommended that human beings are aware of the challenges computers pose and take action to control the risks.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...f artificial intelligence on our lives. While some argue that the advance of computer...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61992619926 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99581458468 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619926199262 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.9171040072 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5882352941 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9411764706 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247612474201 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06862896054 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650442470183 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144783121055 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500559816217 0.056905535591 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.02 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.