Some studies suggest that children spend more time in front of TV than they did in the past and spend less on doing active and creative things. Why do you think this is happening? What methods and measures can be used to solve this issue?
In present epoch, sources of entertainment have changed exponentially as compared to bygone times. It is generally seen that rather than utilising time in innovative and mobile tasks, most of the time by teenagers is spent sitting in front of TV in this contemporary era. This essay discusses the major factor behind this phenomenon and also gauges some solutions.
The primary reason that can be attributed to this vogue is the busy schedule of parents. In other words, both the parents follow a hectic schedule, due to which, they are unable to devote time to monitor the activities of their offsprings. While children take undue advantage of the situation and spend more time watching TV instead of doing any useful work. For example, in earlier days, mothers used to stay at home just to look after their child and indulge him into mind sharpening activities such as playing games like sudoku, chess and other outdoor games, however situation today is different and has resulted into increased screen time. Therefore, the posterity is becoming lethargic and is suffering from physical as well as mental issues. Another worth mentioning reason is the lack of infrastructure. To be precise, cities have become concrete jungles, hardly leaving any space for parks and recreational activities. Thereby, nobody prefers stepping out of home and choose to view TV.
To counter this menace, firstly, parents need to ration the TV viewing hours of the children. Allowing them to watch it fo restricted time period would help to stop excessive use of TV. For instance, setting time to 1-2 hours would prevent children from sitting in front of TV for the whole day, as they would have fear of their parents. Hence, keeping an eye on this would assist to improve their habits. In addition to this, government should provide provision of parks and playgrounds availability of which would encourage teenagers to do outdoor activities.
To conclude, I would like to reiterate by saying that this habit of children not only affects their physical health but also mental health. So, government and parents both need to step forward for the betterment of upcoming generation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-17 | simrankaursidhu | 89 | view |
| 2020-06-22 | Anupama Barooah | 61 | view |
- Vaccinating children against preventable diseases is not only unnecessary but also dangerous To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- University students nowadays have too much freedom and do not study enough To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some studies suggest that children spend more time in front of TV than they did in the past and spend less on doing active and creative things Why do you think this is happening What methods and measures can be used to solve this issue 89
- Some people say women should join army or navy others oppose Your views 73
- Some people say that in all levels of education from primary to university too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills Do you agree or disagree 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 828, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e lack of infrastructure. To be precise, cities have become concrete jungles, har...
^^
Line 7, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... do outdoor activities. To conclude, I would like to reiterate by saying that...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1815.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09831460674 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65291552832 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615168539326 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1951302179 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.833333333 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241886029739 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676839146731 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577868493751 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133331159326 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500146754963 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 828, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e lack of infrastructure. To be precise, cities have become concrete jungles, har...
^^
Line 7, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... do outdoor activities. To conclude, I would like to reiterate by saying that...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1815.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09831460674 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65291552832 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615168539326 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1951302179 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.833333333 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241886029739 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0676839146731 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577868493751 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133331159326 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500146754963 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.